Workable

AI visibility · October 2026 · ranked in 9 leaderboards · workable.com

Rankings by industry

A rank of 1 to 3 earns that leaderboard's badge for the month.

  1. #1 in applicant tracking systems globally

    #1 in Europe · #1 in 4 of 7 countries measured

Your badge

The badge links to this month's leaderboard.

Shape
Size
Colour

Rank and score by month

  • Applicant tracking systems, Global57
255075100October 2026Applicant tracking systems, Global, October 2026: Heralded Score 57

Every leaderboard has one reading so far, from October 2026, so each line is a single dot for now. The next point arrives on 1 November 2026, when the new month's leaderboards publish.

Every leaderboard it is on

LeaderboardMarketAll rank (AI and Search combined)Heralded ScoreAI and SearchChangeOn chart
Applicant tracking systems, Global Global 1 57 , range 30–75
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#1 · 61/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#2 · 52/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Europe Europe 1 46 , range 42–49
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#1 · 46/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
Not measured for this board
First reading Not yet: no monthly series for this leaderboard
Applicant tracking systems, Germany Germany 6 24 , range 15–54
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#5 · 35/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#18 · 5/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Spain Spain 1 54 , range 24–67
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#1 · 47/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#4 · 67/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, France France 9 24 , range 19–56
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#5 · 37/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#31 · 0/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, United Kingdom United Kingdom 1 45 , range 28–71
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#1 · 56/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#9 · 26/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Italy Italy 2 43 , range 24–67
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#1 · 47/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#10 · 34/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Netherlands Netherlands 1 38 , range 23–65
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#2 · 45/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#4 · 27/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Romania Romania 1 56 , range 45–71
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#1 · 56/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
Not measured for this board
First reading

By engine

  • Google AI Mode

    #1average rank

    Best #1 · ranks on 5 leaderboards

  • Gemini

    #2.9average rank

    Best #1 · ranks on 8 leaderboards

  • Google AI Overviews

    #2.4average rank

    Best #1 · ranks on 8 leaderboards

  • ChatGPT

    #2average rank

    Best #1 · ranks on 8 leaderboards

Questions it answers

#QuestionLeaderboardIts placeAlso named
1 What is the best applicant tracking system for small businesses? applicant tracking systems 1
2 Hiring through email and spreadsheets vs. an applicant tracking system for startups applicant tracking systems 2
3 Alternatives to managing candidates in spreadsheets applicant tracking systems 2
4Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
5Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
6Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
7Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
8Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
9 how to manage job applicants in one place applicant tracking systems in Spain 2 Adaptive ATS
10Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.

How engines describe it

  • ChatGPT

    It is worth considering if hiring is frequent enough to justify a larger software budget.

    Asked: “What is the best applicant tracking system for small businesses?” · The most visible applicant tracking systems

  • Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.

Run a full Snapshot to see every description

Sources that mention it

#SourceTypeMentions itRecommends it
1 capterra.com review Yes Yes
2 sparkhire.com vendor Yes Yes
3 zapier.com vendor Yes Yes
4 peoplemanagingpeople.com media Yes Yes
5 softwarefinder.com review Yes Yes
6 technologyadvice.com review Yes No
7 yardstick.team unclassified Yes Yes
8 clearpick.io media Yes Yes
9 leadchangegroup.com review Yes Yes
10 wiserstaff.com media Yes No

Method

Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.

For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.

How the leaderboards are measured