JazzHR

AI visibility · October 2026 · ranked in 9 leaderboards · jazzhr.com · United States

Rankings by industry

A rank of 1 to 3 earns that leaderboard's badge for the month.

  1. #7 in applicant tracking systems globally

    #9 in Europe · #10 in 4 of 7 countries measured

Your badge

The badge links to this month's leaderboard.

Shape
Size
Colour

Rank and score by month

  • Applicant tracking systems, Global28
0255075100October 2026Applicant tracking systems, Global, October 2026: Heralded Score 28

Every leaderboard has one reading so far, from October 2026, so each line is a single dot for now. The next point arrives on 1 November 2026, when the new month's leaderboards publish.

Every leaderboard it is on

LeaderboardMarketAll rank (AI and Search combined)Heralded ScoreAI and SearchChangeOn chart
Applicant tracking systems, Global Global 7 28 , range 19–56
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#5 · 38/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#15 · 12/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Europe Europe 9 10 , range 7–21
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#9 · 10/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
Not measured for this board
First reading Not yet: no monthly series for this leaderboard
Applicant tracking systems, Germany Germany 14 11 , range 1–46
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#16 · 5/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#8 · 21/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Spain Spain 10 16 , range 5–50
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#8 · 26/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#29 · 0/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, France France 16 4 , range 1–46
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#13 · 6/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#31 · 0/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, United Kingdom United Kingdom 10 23 , range 4–50
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#9 · 25/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#14 · 19/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Italy Italy 10 20 , range 3–50
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#10 · 10/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#9 · 38/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Netherlands Netherlands 13 12 , range 2–48
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#14 · 7/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#9 · 21/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Romania Romania 10 9 , range 3–33
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#10 · 9/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
Not measured for this board
First reading

By engine

  • Google AI Mode

    –average rank

    Not ranked · ranks on 0 leaderboards

  • Gemini

    #4.5average rank

    Best #3 · ranks on 2 leaderboards

  • Google AI Overviews

    #5average rank

    Best #4 · ranks on 3 leaderboards

  • ChatGPT

    #6average rank

    Best #6 · ranks on 2 leaderboards

Questions it answers

#QuestionLeaderboardIts placeAlso named
1 What is the best applicant tracking system for small businesses? applicant tracking systems 5
2 best applicant tracking system for small businesses applicant tracking systems 1
3 how to post a job to multiple job boards at once applicant tracking systems in Italy 3
4Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
5 Recruiting software for growing companies applicant tracking systems 8
6Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
7 Recruitment agency vs. in-house recruiting software for growing companies applicant tracking systems 5
8Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
9Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
10Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.

How engines describe it

  • ChatGPT

    Recent comparisons also highlight JazzHR and Manatal as strong options for smaller hiring teams.

    Asked: “best applicant tracking system for small businesses” · The most visible applicant tracking systems

Sources that mention it

#SourceTypeMentions itRecommends it
1 sparkhire.com vendor Yes Yes
2 zapier.com vendor Yes Yes
3 peoplemanagingpeople.com media Yes Yes
4 softwarefinder.com review Yes Yes
5 technologyadvice.com review Yes Yes
6 yardstick.team unclassified Yes Yes
7 clearpick.io media Yes Yes
8 leadchangegroup.com review Yes No
9 wiserstaff.com media Yes Yes
10 leonar.app vendor Yes Yes

Method

Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.

For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.

How the leaderboards are measured