Word of mouth is a chatbot now. It has opinions about you.

ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot and Google form them from everything written about you, and repeat them to every buyer who asks. You don't control what they say. You can change what they read, and Heralded's agents do that work. You approve what ships.

Start free trial. Add a card during your trial to claim 50% off your first 3 months, or subscribe now.

One buyer question, eight weeks of Heralded.

Illustrative. TaskHarbor and its rivals are made up.

Heralded Score

71 +48 Range 66 to 76

5 jobs done. You approved 2 and sent 2.

  1. Week 8

    A buyer asks: What's the best project management tool for a remote engineering team?

    ChatGPT The only pick

    Try TaskHarbor. It's built for remote engineering teams.

Your board has already asked what ChatGPT says about you.

88% of B2B tech CMOs get that question from leadership. 34% have a strategy to answer it with. The buyers moved first:

  • 51%

    of B2B software buyers now start research in an AI chatbot more often than in Google. A year earlier it was 29%.

  • 69%

    ended up choosing a different vendor than they planned after an AI answer.

  • 72%

    of B2B tech marketers have seen AI describe their company wrong.

Buyers show up to the first call with a shortlist and an opinion. A chatbot helped with both.

From named to praised.

AI visibility is a fine name for the first of these. Being named gets you into the answer, and being recommended gets you onto the shortlist. Those two make your Heralded Score. Heralded also reads how AI describes you, and works on all four.

ChatGPT

“What's the best project management tool for a remote engineering team?”

For a fully remote team, TaskHarbor is the strongest fit. TaskHarbor, an async-first tool built for remote engineering teams, replaces live standups with written check-ins, and teams on G2 praise its written standups for cutting meeting time. Loopline suits teams that still run live sprints; Quillboard works if you want docs and tasks in one place.

Illustrative. TaskHarbor and its rivals are made up.
Mark to bring forward in the answer

The Heralded ScoreThe average of Mentioned and Recommended, each shown with your rank among rivals.

How AI describes youNot part of the score.

Other tools draw you a chart of ChatGPT recommending your competitor.

The chart is accurate. It is also where most tools stop.

View

Please flip the switch.Thank you. Much better.

Illustrative. TaskHarbor and its rivals are made up.

TaskHarbor

AI insight: your Visibility Index fell 2.1 points this period, mainly due to lower visibility.

Visibility Index

34.7 down 2.1

vs prev. 8 wks

Weighted AI SoV

12.4% down 3.0pp

ChatGPT-weighted

Citation Velocity

0.83/wk up 0.07

rolling 4 wks

Sentiment Delta

+0.04σ down 0.01

vs category mean

Prompt Coverage

27/40 down 2

67.5% of set

Brand Salience

0.412 up 0.009

normalized, 0 to 1

Answer Share by Intent

9.8% down 1.2pp

Commercial intent

Avg. Mention Position

3.6 up 0.2

lower is better

Mention Rate

41.2% up 0.8pp

all engines, all runs

Source Authority

61 unchanged 0

DA-weighted

Competitive Gap

−28.6 down 4.1

vs Loopline

Hallucination Risk

Medium

3 flags, model-estimated

Visibility Index by engine
Sentiment mix
Citation density, engine × week

Updated just now

6 engines, 40 prompts, 3 runs each. Scores are model estimates.

TaskHarborCommand Center

Autonomy: Ask first

One thing needs you this week. The agents did the rest, and ChatGPT now recommends you first for remote teams.

Heralded Score

Up from 41 to 58

Range 53 to 63

+17 since the agents started

  1. Done by an agent

    Opened /pricing and /compare to AI crawlers

    Fixed through WordPress. Monday's read confirmed it.

    Gained +3 pts

  2. Done by an agent

    Published "TaskHarbor vs Loopline for distributed teams"

    You approved the draft. ChatGPT already cites it.

    Gained +4 pts

  3. Needs you

    Ask 12 happy customers for a G2 review

    Drafted. You send it; Heralded watches G2.

    Expected gain +2 ptsReview and send

Every tool can show you the problem now. What happens after the chart is the product, and it's the part Heralded does.

Engines repeat what they read. So that's where the agents work.

  1. Your site.

    Pages blocked for AI crawlers, missing schema, pages that answer nobody's question. Agents fix what they can through your CMS once you approve, and hand you the rest as a ready change.

  2. The sites that cover your category.

    The lists, comparisons and review pages the engines cite when they skip you. Agents find them, draft the pitch, and watch for the citation once you send it.

  3. What you publish.

    The questions buyers ask that you have no page for. Studio writes the page, you approve it and publish it, and Heralded watches for the engines to cite it.

ChatGPT

What's the best project management tool for a remote engineering team?

Try TaskHarbor. It's built for remote engineering teams.

  1. taskharbor.com/pricing
  2. RemoteStack Weekly, Best PM tools for async teams 2026
  3. taskharbor.com/async-standups

Illustrative. TaskHarbor and its rivals are made up.

Every tool you connect gives them another pair of hands: search data and analytics to read from, a CMS or a code repository to write to. New ones ship every month.

The same work lifts your Google rankings and referral traffic. We keep score where buyers ask first.

See how the Command Center works

Agencies charge $5,000 to $10,000 a month for this. Heralded starts at €99.

To be fair, theirs comes with a person, a kickoff workshop and a 40-slide deck about next quarter.

Find out if you need AI visibility before you pay for it.

The Snapshot tells you in about ten minutes whether the AI engines recommend you, who they recommend instead, and what to do next. It's the most complete AI visibility snapshot we could find*, and your first one is free.

*And we really searched. Nearly 50 one-off scans, free and paid, side by side.

Snapshot reporttaskharbor.com
Heralded Score 19 of 100, range 16 to 25

You're named in a few answers and recommended in none. Worth fixing.

Mentioned
3831 to 453rd of 4
Recommended
00 to 44th of 4
Understood
4436 to 52
Praised
115 to 17
Named most instead of you

Loopline

What to do next

Get onto the pages that decide it. The lists and comparisons the engines cite for your category name Loopline and skip you.

Illustrative. TaskHarbor and its rivals are made up.

Get heralded.

Put the agents to work on your brand. 7 days free. No card needed.

50% off your first 3 months of Core or Plus. 50 spots, then it's the regular price. Which is also a fair price.

Monthly plans, until 31 December.

Start free trial. Add a card during your trial to claim 50% off your first 3 months, or subscribe now.

Questions

Which AI engines does Heralded read?

ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode every day, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot twice a week, and all six in every weekly report. Claude is an add-on on the paid plans.

What do the agents actually do?

They fix your site through your CMS once you approve, write the pages you're missing for you to approve and publish, draft pitches to the sites the engines cite, and check the next reads to see whether the work moved the answer. Nothing goes live on your site without your approval, and emails go out when you send them.

What is the free Snapshot?

A one-time report on your domain that tells you whether the AI engines recommend you, who they recommend instead, how they describe you, which sources decide it, and what to do next. One per account is free.

What does it cost?

The Snapshot is free. The Command Center starts at €99 a month for Core, with 7 days free and no card needed. Agencies have their own plan. Prices exclude VAT.

Sources

  1. Corporate Ink, B2B tech CMO survey on AI visibility, May 2026 (150 US B2B tech marketers).
  2. G2, 2026 AI Search Insight Report, March 2026 (1,076 B2B software buyers).
  3. Agency-published GEO retainer pricing for mid-market B2B, 2026.