Greenhouse
Rankings by industry
A rank of 1 to 3 earns that leaderboard's badge for the month.
Rank and score by month
- Applicant tracking systems, Global47
No lines on the chart. Tick Show on chart in the table below, or add a leaderboard above.
Every leaderboard has one reading so far, from October 2026, so each line is a single dot for now. The next point arrives on 1 November 2026, when the new month's leaderboards publish. Chart up to 5 leaderboards at once.
Every leaderboard it is on
| Leaderboard | Market | All rank (AI and Search combined) | Heralded Score | AI and Search | Change | On chart |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicant tracking systems, Global | Global | 2 | 47 , range 22–63 |
| First reading | |
| Applicant tracking systems, Europe | Europe | 5 | 30 , range 21–33 |
| First reading | Not yet: no monthly series for this leaderboard |
| Applicant tracking systems, Germany | Germany | 4 | 27 , range 5–51 |
| First reading | |
| Applicant tracking systems, Spain | Spain | 3 | 45 , range 7–54 |
| First reading | |
| Applicant tracking systems, France | France | 11 | 15 , range 4–50 |
| First reading | |
| Applicant tracking systems, United Kingdom | United Kingdom | 2 | 36 , range 14–55 |
| First reading | |
| Applicant tracking systems, Italy | Italy | 4 | 38 , range 4–53 |
| First reading | |
| Applicant tracking systems, Netherlands | Netherlands | 7 | 25 , range 5–52 |
| First reading | |
| Applicant tracking systems, Romania | Romania | 6 | 33 , range 16–42 |
| First reading | |
| No leaderboard matches this filter. | ||||||
By engine
-
Google AI Mode
#2.8average rank
Best #2 · ranks on 4 leaderboards
-
Gemini
#4.8average rank
Best #3 · ranks on 8 leaderboards
-
Google AI Overviews
#5.3average rank
Best #2 · ranks on 4 leaderboards
-
ChatGPT
#6.8average rank
Best #4 · ranks on 4 leaderboards
Questions it answers
| # | Question | Leaderboard | Its place | Also named |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Recruiting software for growing companies | applicant tracking systems | 1 | |
| 2 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||
| 3 | Hiring through email and spreadsheets vs. an applicant tracking system for startups | applicant tracking systems | 1 | |
| 4 | Alternatives to managing candidates in spreadsheets | applicant tracking systems | 1 | |
| 5 | recruiting software for startups | applicant tracking systems in Spain | 2 | |
| 6 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||
| 7 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||
| 8 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||
| 9 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||
| 10 | recruiting software for startups | applicant tracking systems in Italy | 3 | |
How engines describe it
-
ChatGPT
My recommendation is to shortlist Ashby, Workable, Teamtailor, Breezy HR, and Greenhouse.
Asked: “recruiting software for startups” · The most visible applicant tracking systems in Spain
-
Google AI Mode
In-house software (such as Greenhouse, Lever, Workable, or Ashby) empowers your team to run the hiring process internally, centralizing applicants, automating workflows, and building a branded career page.
Asked: “Recruitment agency vs. in-house recruiting software for growing companies” · The most visible applicant tracking systems
Sources that mention it
| # | Source | Type | Mentions it | Recommends it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | review | Yes | Yes | |
| 2 | vendor | Yes | No | |
| 3 | vendor | Yes | Yes | |
| 4 | media | Yes | Yes | |
| 5 | review | Yes | Yes | |
| 6 | review | Yes | Yes | |
| 7 | unclassified | Yes | Yes | |
| 8 | media | Yes | Yes | |
| 9 | review | Yes | No | |
| 10 | media | Yes | No |
Method
Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.
For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.