Lever

AI visibility · October 2026 · ranked in 10 leaderboards · lever.co · United States

Rankings by industry

A rank of 1 to 3 earns that leaderboard's badge for the month.

  1. #4 in applicant tracking systems globally

    #8 in Europe · #4 in United Kingdom

  2. Not ranked yet among marketing agencies

    Ranked in 0 of 9 markets measured

Your badge

The badge links to this month's leaderboard.

Shape
Size
Colour

Rank and score by month

  • Applicant tracking systems, Global36
255075100October 2026Applicant tracking systems, Global, October 2026: Heralded Score 36

Every leaderboard has one reading so far, from October 2026, so each line is a single dot for now. The next point arrives on 1 November 2026, when the new month's leaderboards publish.

Every leaderboard it is on

LeaderboardMarketAll rank (AI and Search combined)Heralded ScoreAI and SearchChangeOn chart
Applicant tracking systems, Global Global 4 36 , range 17–56
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#6 · 36/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#5 · 38/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Europe Europe 8 11 , range 8–23
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#8 · 11/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
Not measured for this board
First reading Not yet: no monthly series for this leaderboard
Applicant tracking systems, Germany Germany 18 4 , range 2–45
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#15 · 6/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#30 · 0/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Spain Spain 5 35 , range 4–51
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#9 · 15/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#3 · 68/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, France France 15 6 , range 2–47
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#11 · 8/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#27 · 1/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, United Kingdom United Kingdom 4 30 , range 7–52
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#6 · 31/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#7 · 28/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Italy Italy 11 18 , range 3–50
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#11 · 10/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#13 · 31/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Netherlands Netherlands 10 16 , range 2–49
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#11 · 9/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#4 · 27/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Romania Romania 12 8 , range 4–33
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#12 · 8/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
Not measured for this board
First reading
Marketing agencies, United Kingdom United Kingdom – Too few answers
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
Not ranked · Not measured
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#60 · 0/100
First reading

By engine

  • Google AI Mode

    #4average rank

    Best #4 · ranks on 1 leaderboard

  • Gemini

    #5.9average rank

    Best #3 · ranks on 8 leaderboards

  • Google AI Overviews

    #7.3average rank

    Best #4 · ranks on 3 leaderboards

  • ChatGPT

    #6.5average rank

    Best #5 · ranks on 2 leaderboards

Questions it answers

#QuestionLeaderboardIts placeAlso named
1 how to manage job applicants in one place applicant tracking systems in Spain 4 Adaptive ATS
2Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
3 marketing agency for a software company marketing agencies in United Kingdom 2 Catchy
4Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
5 Recruiting software for growing companies applicant tracking systems 4
6Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
7 Hiring through email and spreadsheets vs. an applicant tracking system for startups applicant tracking systems 5
8 Recruitment agency vs. in-house recruiting software for growing companies applicant tracking systems 2
9 Alternatives to managing candidates in spreadsheets applicant tracking systems 12
10 Alternatives to posting each job ad on job boards by hand applicant tracking systems 5

How engines describe it

  • ChatGPT

    A candidate for software companies looking to scale Google, Microsoft and LinkedIn advertising across multiple markets.

    Asked: “marketing agency for a software company” · The most visible marketing agencies in United Kingdom

  • Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.

Run a full Snapshot to see every description

Sources that mention it

#SourceTypeMentions itRecommends it
1 capterra.com review Yes No
2 sparkhire.com vendor Yes Yes
3 zapier.com vendor Yes Yes
4 softwarefinder.com review Yes Yes
5 technologyadvice.com review Yes No
6 yardstick.team unclassified Yes Yes
7 leadchangegroup.com review Yes No
8 wiserstaff.com media Yes No
9 leonar.app vendor Yes Yes
10 ordio.com vendor Yes No

Method

Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.

For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.

How the leaderboards are measured