Leader
45Heralded Score, range 19–59
The most visible applicant tracking systems in Italy, October 2026
Most cited source
2citations
From Google AI Overviews
Where engines disagree most
1/4engines put it in their top three
Top three on Gemini, not on Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT
Brands
| Rank | Brand | Rank change | Heralded Score All | AI | Search | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | New entry | 45 , range 19–59 | 38#3 | 58#3 | 45
| 21% | 13% | None | First reading | |
| 2 | | New entry | 43 , range 24–67 | 47#1 | 34#10 | 43
| 33% | 15% | None | First reading | |
| 3 | | New entry | 38 , range 9–54 | 31#6 | 51#4 | 38
| 18% | 5% | None | First reading | |
| 4 | | New entry | 38 , range 4–53 | 23#8 | 62#2 | 38
| 14% | 6% | None | First reading | |
| 5 | | New entry | 37 , range 19–59 | 38#2 | 34#11 | 37
| 18% | 14% | None | First reading | |
| 6 | | New entry | 36 , range 6–54 | 31#7 | 45#6 | 36
| 16% | 6% | None | First reading | |
| 7 | | New entry | 31 , range 14–56 | 35#4 | 23= #16 | 31
| 19% | 7% | None | First reading | |
| 8 | | New entry | 25 , range 11–55 | 34#5 | 11#22 | 25
| 14% | 10% | None | First reading | |
| 9 | | New entry | 23 , range 2–50 | 8#12 | 49#5 | 23
| 10% | 3% | None | First reading | |
| 10 | | New entry | 20 , range 3–50 | 10#10 | 38#9 | 20
| 8% | 5% | None | First reading |
“=” marks brands whose score ranges overlap, so the test cannot separate them. Every brand named in at least three answers is ranked. AI and Search give each brand’s score and rank on that side alone. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Community | 3.3% | 1 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 2 | | Community | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
| 3 | | Community | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
Questions asked
| Question | Language | Most recommended |
|---|---|---|
| Qual è il miglior software per gestire le candidature nelle piccole imprese? | Italian | |
| Software di recruiting per aziende in crescita | Italian | |
| Come può una piccola azienda gestire le candidature senza perdere candidati? | Italian | |
| Come posso organizzare le selezioni quando riceviamo centinaia di candidature? | Italian | No brand recommended |
| Gestire le selezioni via email e fogli di calcolo o usare un software per le candidature: cosa conviene a una startup? | Italian | |
| Agenzia di selezione o software di recruiting interno per aziende in crescita? | Italian | No brand recommended |
| Alternative alla gestione dei candidati con i fogli di calcolo | Italian | |
| Alternative alla pubblicazione manuale degli annunci di lavoro sui portali | Italian | Flowxtra |
| Sono l’unico recruiter in un’azienda di 100 persone. Quale software può aiutarmi a gestire le selezioni? | Italian | |
| Gestisco una startup che quest’anno deve assumere dieci persone e ho bisogno di un processo di selezione semplice. | Italian | No brand recommended |
Each engine's top three
Google AI Mode
- 1
Workable
- 2
Teamtailor
- 3
In-Recruiting
Gemini
Google AI Overviews
- 1
- = 2
- = 2
Zoho Recruit
ChatGPT
- 1
- 2
Breezy HR
- 3
Related leaderboards
Method
Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.
For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.