Most cited source
323citations
From Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews
Explore brands in industry panels measured from Italy.
Most cited source
323citations
From Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews
Where engines disagree most
Not compared
A list across industries has no engine top three.
| Brand | Place in its industry | Heralded Score | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | #3 in password managers in Italy | 46 , range 12–54 | No history yet | 20% | 6% | | First reading | |
| | Unranked in password managers in ItalyUnranked in VPNs in Italy#8 in endpoint security tools in Italy#3 in antivirus apps in Italy | 15 , range 3–35 | No history yet | 7% | 1% | | First reading | |
| | #3 in marketing automation tools in Italy | 32 , range 25–66 | No history yet | 32% | 13% | None | First reading | |
| | #3 in European neobanks in Italy | 31 , range 23–61 | No history yet | 27% | 11% | None | First reading | |
| | #3 in e-signature tools in Italy | 39 , range 32–48 | No history yet | 32% | 16% | None | First reading | |
| | #3 in sales engagement tools in Italy | 34 , range 21–43 | No history yet | 29% | 7% | None | First reading | |
| | #3 in travel and expense tools in Italy | 33 , range 25–65 | No history yet | 34% | 12% | | First reading | |
| | #3 in VPNs in Italy#11 in antivirus apps in Italy | 22 , range 8–50 | No history yet | 10% | 7% | | First reading | |
| | #3 in e-commerce platforms in Italy | 51 , range 28–73 | No history yet | 35% | 25% | None | First reading | |
| | #3 in CRM tools in Italy | 35 , range 26–70 | No history yet | 31% | 20% | | First reading |
This list spans more than one industry, so each brand shows its place in its own. Every brand named in at least three answers is placed. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Social | 15.4% | 2 of 4 | 293 | Not read |
| 2 | | Community | 7.3% | 3 of 4 | 95 | 18 |
| 3 | | Regulator | 3.0% | 2 of 4 | 51 | Not read |
| 4 | | Regulator | 2.3% | 1 of 4 | 24 | 3 |
| 5 | | Vendor site | 2.5% | 4 of 4 | 22 | 19 |
| 6 | | Social | 2.3% | 2 of 4 | 33 | Not read |
| 7 | | Regulator | 1.3% | 3 of 4 | 15 | 1 |
| 8 | | Social | 1.8% | 2 of 4 | 26 | Not read |
| 9 | | Media | 2.1% | 3 of 4 | 22 | 20 |
| 10 | | Regulator | 1.1% | 2 of 4 | 18 | Not read |
| Question | Language | Wins it |
|---|---|---|
| best e-signature tools for small businesses | English | |
| sign contracts online for small business clients | English | |
| how can a small business get customer contracts signed faster | English | |
| how to collect signatures on agreements without printing | English | |
| digital signatures vs signing paper contracts for small businesses | English | No brand recommended |
For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.