Most cited source
323citations
From Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews
AI visibility in Italy
Explore brands in industry panels measured from Italy.
Where engines disagree most
Not compared
A list across industries has no engine top three.
Brands
| Brand | Place in its industry | Heralded Score | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Squarespace US | #2 in website builders in Italy | 73 , range 40–82 | No history yet | 55% | 34% | | First reading | |
| | #2 in business intelligence tools in Italy | 42 , range 15–57 | No history yet | 21% | 9% | None | First reading | |
| | #2 in European neobanks in Italy | 36 , range 25–67 | No history yet | 30% | 17% | | First reading | |
| | #2 in e-commerce platforms in Italy | 74 , range 49–83 | No history yet | 60% | 33% | None | First reading | |
| | #3 in project management tools in Italy | 53 , range 43–69 | No history yet | 49% | 33% | | First reading | |
| | #3 in cloud hosting platforms in Italy | 45 , range 25–68 | No history yet | 33% | 17% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in travel and expense tools in Italy#3 in HR and payroll tools in Italy | 18 , range 6–48 | No history yet | 10% | 5% | | First reading | |
| | Unranked in travel and expense tools in Italy#3 in ERP tools in ItalyUnranked in accounting tools in Italy | 11 , range 5–45 | No history yet | 7% | 4% | None | First reading | |
| | #3 in accounting tools in Italy | 27 , range 22–61 | No history yet | 23% | 13% | None | First reading | |
| | #3 in business intelligence tools in Italy | 40 , range 25–62 | No history yet | 28% | 17% | None | First reading |
This list spans more than one industry, so each brand shows its place in its own. Every brand named in at least three answers is placed. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | | Media | 1.4% | 3 of 4 | 14 | 41 |
| 12 | | Regulator | 1.0% | 3 of 4 | 15 | 1 |
| 13 | | Review site | 1.5% | 4 of 4 | 15 | 19 |
| 14 | | Media | 1.7% | 4 of 4 | 13 | 5 |
| 15 | | Vendor site | 1.4% | 4 of 4 | 15 | 40 |
| 16 | | Community | 1.6% | 2 of 4 | 19 | Not read |
| 17 | | Regulator | 1.0% | 1 of 4 | 7 | Not read |
| 18 | | Regulator | 0.8% | 2 of 4 | 16 | Not read |
| 19 | | Review site | 1.0% | 3 of 4 | 15 | Not read |
| 20 | | Regulator | 1.0% | 3 of 4 | 7 | 6 |
The questions, and who wins each
| Question | Language | Wins it |
|---|---|---|
| best e-signature tools for small businesses | English | |
| sign contracts online for small business clients | English | |
| how can a small business get customer contracts signed faster | English | |
| how to collect signatures on agreements without printing | English | |
| digital signatures vs signing paper contracts for small businesses | English | No brand recommended |
Industries
Method
For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.