Teamtailor

AI visibility · October 2026 · ranked in 9 leaderboards · teamtailor.com · Sweden

Rankings by industry

A rank of 1 to 3 earns that leaderboard's badge for the month.

  1. #4 in applicant tracking systems in Europe

    #5 in France

Your badge

The badge links to this month's leaderboard.

Shape
Size
Colour

Rank and score by month

  • Applicant tracking systems, GlobalNot measured
75100October 2026

Every leaderboard has one reading so far, from October 2026, so each line is a single dot for now. The next point arrives on 1 November 2026, when the new month's leaderboards publish.

Every leaderboard it is on

LeaderboardMarketAll rank (AI and Search combined)Heralded ScoreAI and SearchChangeOn chart
Applicant tracking systems, Global Global – Too few answers
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
Not ranked · Not measured
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#16 · 9/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Europe Europe 4 34 , range 32–37
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#4 · 34/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
Not measured for this board
First reading Not yet: no monthly series for this leaderboard
Applicant tracking systems, Germany Germany 13 12 , range 4–49
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#8 · 18/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#20 · 3/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Spain Spain 8 23 , range 13–54
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#4 · 34/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#23 · 3/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, France France 5 35 , range 22–60
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#1 · 42/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#13 · 23/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, United Kingdom United Kingdom 7 27 , range 5–51
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#8 · 28/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#8 · 27/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Italy Italy 7 31 , range 14–56
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#4 · 35/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#16 · 23/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Netherlands Netherlands 6 27 , range 21–59
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#3 · 40/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
#17 · 5/100
First reading
Applicant tracking systems, Romania Romania 7 31 , range 10–40
AI (How the engines answer the board's questions)
#7 · 31/100
Search (Google's top 10 for the questions' demand keywords)
Not measured for this board
First reading

By engine

  • Google AI Mode

    #2average rank

    Best #2 · ranks on 2 leaderboards

  • Gemini

    #6average rank

    Best #3 · ranks on 4 leaderboards

  • Google AI Overviews

    #4average rank

    Best #2 · ranks on 5 leaderboards

  • ChatGPT

    #3.2average rank

    Best #2 · ranks on 6 leaderboards

Questions it answers

#QuestionLeaderboardIts placeAlso named
1 Alternativas a publicar manualmente cada oferta de empleo en portales de trabajo applicant tracking systems in Spain 1
2Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
3Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
4Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
5Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
6 Je suis le seul recruteur dans une entreprise de 100 personnes. Quel logiciel peut m’aider à gérer les recrutements ? applicant tracking systems in France 2
7 Software di recruiting per aziende in crescita applicant tracking systems in Italy 1
8Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
9Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.
10Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it.

How engines describe it

  • ChatGPT

    Util dacă vrei o pagină de cariere atractivă, o experiență bună pentru candidați și colaborare între recrutori și managerii care angajează.

    Asked: “Software de recrutare pentru companii în creștere” · The most visible applicant tracking systems in Romania

Sources that mention it

#SourceTypeMentions itRecommends it
11 shine.fr vendor Yes Yes
12 sparkhire.com vendor Yes Yes
13 franklandautomation.com consulting Yes No
14 jeyagroup.co.uk consulting Yes No
15 canditech.io vendor Yes Yes
16 klearskill.com vendor Yes Yes
17 treegarden.io vendor Yes Yes
18 peoplemanagingpeople.com media Yes No
19 appvizer.it review Yes No
20 jugglehire.com vendor Yes No

Method

Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.

For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.

How the leaderboards are measured