Leader
71Heralded Score, range 58–75
The most visible headless CMS platforms in Europe, October 2026
Most cited source
82citations
From Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews
Where engines disagree most
They agree
Every engine names the same top three.
Brands
| Rank | Brand | Rank change | Heralded Score All | AI | Search | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | | New entry | 8 , range 3–30 | 3#11 | 16#11 | 8
| 4% | 1% | | First reading | |
| 12 | | New entry | 5 , range 2–30 | 3#12 | 9#12 | 5
| 3% | 1% | | First reading | |
| 13 | | New entry | 5 , range 2–31 | 5#10 | 5#15 | 5
| 3% | 1% | | First reading | |
| 14 | | New entry | 3 , range 1–29 | 2#14 | 5#14 | 3
| 2% | 0% | | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 6#13 | –
| 1% | 0% | | First reading |
“=” marks brands whose score ranges overlap, so the test cannot separate them. Every brand named in at least three answers is ranked. AI and Search give each brand’s score and rank on that side alone. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Social | 12.4% | 2 of 4 | 40 | Not read |
| 2 | | Community | 9.8% | 2 of 4 | 30 | 12 |
| 3 | | Consultancy | 7.4% | 1 of 4 | 1 | 9 |
| 4 | | Community | 5.7% | 3 of 4 | 6 | 10 |
| 5 | | Vendor site | 6.2% | 3 of 4 | 4 | 8 |
| 6 | | Vendor site | 4.8% | 3 of 4 | 7 | 9 |
| 7 | | Vendor site | 1.7% | 2 of 4 | 8 | Not read |
| 8 | | Vendor site | 4.3% | 3 of 4 | 1 | 9 |
| 9 | | Media | 3.6% | 1 of 4 | 1 | 8 |
| 10 | | Review site | 3.6% | 2 of 4 | 4 | 9 |
Questions asked
| Question | Language | Most recommended |
|---|---|---|
| Open-source of gehost headless CMS voor startups? | Dutch | |
| Alternatieven voor een traditioneel CMS voor een website met meerdere kanalen | Dutch | |
| Alternatieven voor content hardcoderen in een webapp | Dutch | No brand recommended |
| Ik ben front-enddeveloper en bouw een marketingwebsite. Welk headless CMS kan ik het beste gebruiken? | Dutch | |
| Ik geef leiding aan digital bij een middelgroot bedrijf en wil één contenthub voor onze website, app en winkels. Welke oplossing is geschikt? | Dutch | |
| best headless cms for developers | English | |
| headless cms for ecommerce websites | English | |
| how to manage content for a website and mobile app in one place | English | |
| how to migrate from a traditional cms to a headless cms | English | No brand recommended |
| headless cms vs traditional cms for marketing teams | English | No brand recommended |
Each engine's top three
Google AI Mode
- = 1
Sanity
- = 1
Strapi
- 3
Contentful
Gemini
- 1
- 2
- 3
Google AI Overviews
- 1
- 2
- 3
ChatGPT
- 1
- 2
- 3
Related leaderboards
Method
Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.
For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.