Leader
49Heralded Score, range 26–69
The most visible workflow automation and AI agent platforms in Netherlands, October 2026
Most cited source
17citations
From Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews
Where engines disagree most
1/4engines put it in their top three
Top three on Gemini, not on Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT
Brands
| Rank | Brand | Rank change | Heralded Score All | AI | Search | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 0= #20 | –
| 2% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 0= #20 | –
| 1% | 0% | | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 0= #20 | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 2= #12 | –
| 2% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 2= #12 | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 0= #20 | –
| 1% | 0% | None | First reading |
“=” marks brands whose score ranges overlap, so the test cannot separate them. Every brand named in at least three answers is ranked. AI and Search give each brand’s score and rank on that side alone. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Social | 11.7% | 2 of 4 | 16 | Not read |
| 2 | | Vendor site | 6.7% | 1 of 4 | 8 | Not read |
| 3 | | Social | 8.3% | 2 of 4 | 6 | Not read |
| 4 | | Vendor site | 5.0% | 2 of 4 | 4 | Not read |
| 5 | | Media | 3.3% | 1 of 4 | 4 | Not read |
| 6 | | Vendor site | 6.7% | 3 of 4 | 1 | 4 |
| 7 | | Community | 5.0% | 2 of 4 | 3 | Not read |
| 8 | | Community | 5.0% | 1 of 4 | 3 | Not read |
| 9 | | Vendor site | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 3 | Not read |
| 10 | | Media | 3.3% | 1 of 4 | 1 | 4 |
Questions asked
| Question | Language | Most recommended |
|---|---|---|
| Wat zijn de beste tools voor workflowautomatisering voor kleine bedrijven? | Dutch | |
| AI-agents om bedrijfsprocessen te automatiseren | Dutch | |
| Hoe kan een klein team zijn apps koppelen en routinematig werk automatiseren? | Dutch | |
| Hoe bouw ik een AI-agent die repetitieve taken voor mijn team uitvoert? | Dutch | |
| Handmatige overdrachten of geautomatiseerde workflows voor operationele teams? | Dutch | No brand recommended |
| Regelgebaseerde automatisering of AI-agents voor bedrijfsprocessen? | Dutch | No brand recommended |
| Wat zijn alternatieven voor het handmatig kopiëren van gegevens tussen apps? | Dutch | |
| Wat zijn alternatieven voor het inhuren van developers om integraties te bouwen? | Dutch | |
| Ik geef leiding aan de operationele afdeling van een bedrijf met 50 medewerkers. Welke tools kan ik gebruiken om goedkeuringen en gegevensinvoer te automatiseren? | Dutch | |
| Ik geef leiding aan een financieel team dat overspoeld wordt met facturen en wil de verwerking ervan automatiseren. | Dutch | No brand recommended |
Each engine's top three
Related leaderboards
Method
Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.
For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.