Leader
68Heralded Score, range 33–77
The most visible social media management tools in Netherlands, October 2026
Most cited source
12citations
From ChatGPT
Where engines disagree most
1/4engines put it in their top three
Top three on Google AI Overviews, not on Google AI Mode, Gemini and ChatGPT
Brands
| Rank | Brand | Rank change | Heralded Score All | AI | Search | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | SocialInbox | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 0= #26 | –
| 1% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | Socialync | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 0= #26 | –
| 2% | 0% | | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 13#14 | –
| 1% | 1% | | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 0= #26 | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 0= #26 | –
| 1% | 1% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 5#17 | –
| 3% | 1% | | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 1#25 | –
| 1% | 1% | None | First reading |
“=” marks brands whose score ranges overlap, so the test cannot separate them. Every brand named in at least three answers is ranked. AI and Search give each brand’s score and rank on that side alone. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Vendor site | 5.0% | 1 of 4 | 11 | Not read |
| 2 | | Community | 10.0% | 2 of 4 | 6 | Not read |
| 3 | | Media | 8.3% | 3 of 4 | 1 | 5 |
| 4 | | Consultancy | 8.3% | 4 of 4 | 3 | 10 |
| 5 | | Vendor site | 8.3% | 3 of 4 | 2 | 17 |
| 6 | | Vendor site | 6.7% | 2 of 4 | 1 | 8 |
| 7 | | Social | 5.0% | 2 of 4 | 4 | Not read |
| 8 | | Review site | 5.0% | 2 of 4 | 2 | 5 |
| 9 | | Vendor site | 5.0% | 2 of 4 | 2 | 2 |
| 10 | | Vendor site | 5.0% | 1 of 4 | 3 | Not read |
Questions asked
| Question | Language | Most recommended |
|---|---|---|
| Wat zijn de beste tools voor socialmediabeheer voor kleine teams? | Dutch | |
| Socialmediaberichten inplannen voor kleine bedrijven | Dutch | |
| Hoe kan een klein bedrijf berichten op meerdere sociale netwerken plaatsen zonder op elk netwerk apart in te loggen? | Dutch | |
| Hoe plan en plan ik een maand aan socialmediaberichten in? | Dutch | |
| Berichten inplannen via elk sociaal netwerk zelf of een tool voor socialmediabeheer gebruiken: wat is beter voor bureaus? | Dutch | |
| Social media handmatig beheren of een planningstool gebruiken: wat is beter voor kleine bedrijven? | Dutch | |
| Wat zijn alternatieven voor het handmatig plaatsen van berichten op elk sociaal netwerk? | Dutch | |
| Wat zijn alternatieven voor het bijhouden van socialmediaprestaties in spreadsheets? | Dutch | |
| Ik beheer de social media voor vijf klanten. Welke tool kan ik gebruiken om hun berichten in te plannen en er rapportages over te maken? | Dutch | |
| Ik heb een kleine winkel en wil al mijn socialmediaberichten op één plek beantwoorden. | Dutch | |
Each engine's top three
Related leaderboards
Method
Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.
For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.