Leader
71Heralded Score, range 43–78
The most visible project management tools in United Kingdom, October 2026
Most cited source
12citations
From Google AI Overviews
Where engines disagree most
1/4engines put it in their top three
Top three on ChatGPT, not on Google AI Mode, Gemini and Google AI Overviews
Brands
| Rank | Brand | Rank change | Heralded Score All | AI | Search | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 0= #54 | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 0= #54 | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 0= #54 | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 11#16 | –
| 1% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 4#35 | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 0= #54 | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 0= #54 | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 1= #48 | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 0= #54 | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | 0= #54 | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading |
“=” marks brands whose score ranges overlap, so the test cannot separate them. Every brand named in at least three answers is ranked. AI and Search give each brand’s score and rank on that side alone. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | | Review site | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 12 | | Vendor site | 3.3% | 1 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 13 | | Review site | 3.3% | 1 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 14 | | Vendor site | 3.3% | 2 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 15 | | Vendor site | 3.3% | 1 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 16 | | Vendor site | 3.3% | 2 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 17 | | Vendor site | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
| 18 | | Vendor site | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
| 19 | | Media | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
| 20 | | Media | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
Questions asked
| Question | Language | Most recommended |
|---|---|---|
| best project management software for small software teams | English | |
| plan and track software projects for small development teams | English | |
| how can a small software team keep projects on schedule | English | |
| how to assign work and track deadlines across a remote team | English | |
| kanban boards vs task lists for small software teams | English | No brand recommended |
Each engine's top three
Related leaderboards
Method
Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.
For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.