Leader
72Heralded Score, range 68–75
The most visible project management tools in Europe, October 2026
Most cited source
25citations
From Google AI Mode, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT
Where engines disagree most
1/4engines put it in their top three
Top three on Gemini, not on Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT
Brands
Search is not measured for this board yet, so it ranks on AI answers.
| Rank | Brand | Rank change | Heralded Score All | AI | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | New entry | 72 , range 68–75 | 72#1 | 72
| 75% | 43% | | First reading | |
| 2 | | New entry | 70 , range 65–73 | 70#2 | 70
| 75% | 37% | | First reading | |
| 3 | | New entry | 54 , range 49–60 | 54#3 | 54
| 55% | 29% | | First reading | |
| 4 | | New entry | 44 , range 41–48 | 44#4 | 44
| 44% | 18% | | First reading | |
| 5 | | New entry | 43 , range 40–47 | 43#5 | 43
| 39% | 20% | | First reading | |
| 6 | | New entry | 40 , range 37–43 | 40#6 | 40
| 37% | 14% | | First reading | |
| 7 | | New entry | 31 , range 24–34 | 31#7 | 31
| 18% | 11% | | First reading | |
| 8 | | New entry | 21 , range 10–31 | 21#8 | 21
| 12% | 9% | None | First reading | |
| 9 | | New entry | 16 , range 9–30 | 16#9 | 16
| 12% | 7% | | First reading | |
| 10 | | New entry | 7 , range 5–12 | 7#10 | 7
| 7% | 4% | | First reading |
“=” marks brands whose score ranges overlap, so the test cannot separate them. Every brand named in at least three answers is ranked. AI gives each brand’s score and rank from the engines’ answers; Search is not measured for this board yet. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Media | 5.5% | 4 of 4 | 24 | Not read |
| 2 | | Media | 3.1% | 1 of 4 | 4 | 8 |
| 3 | | Media | 1.0% | 2 of 4 | 5 | Not read |
| 4 | | Media | 1.2% | 3 of 4 | 1 | 10 |
| 5 | | Media | 1.0% | 1 of 4 | 4 | Not read |
| 6 | | Media | 0.7% | 1 of 4 | 3 | Not read |
| 7 | | Media | 0.7% | 1 of 4 | 1 | 6 |
| 8 | | Media | 0.7% | 1 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
| 9 | | Media | 0.7% | 2 of 4 | 1 | 9 |
| 10 | | Media | 0.7% | 1 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
Questions asked
| Question | Language | Most recommended |
|---|---|---|
| best project management software for small software teams | English | |
| plan and track software projects for small development teams | English | |
| how can a small software team keep projects on schedule | English | |
| how to assign work and track deadlines across a remote team | English | |
| kanban boards vs task lists for small software teams | English | No brand recommended |
Each engine's top three
Related leaderboards
Method
Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.
For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.