Most cited source
151citations
From Google AI Mode, Gemini and Google AI Overviews
AI visibility in the Netherlands
Explore brands in industry panels measured from the Netherlands.
Where engines disagree most
Not compared
A list across industries has no engine top three.
Brands
| Brand | Place in its industry | Heralded Score | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Unranked in project management tools in Netherlands#1 in ERP tools in NetherlandsUnranked in CRM tools in Netherlands | 24 , range 17–51 | No history yet | 17% | 6% | None | First reading | |
| | #1 in business intelligence tools in Netherlands | 64 , range 30–75 | No history yet | 48% | 21% | | First reading | |
| | #1 in European neobanks in Netherlands | 65 , range 51–76 | No history yet | 64% | 39% | None | First reading | |
| | #1 in travel and expense tools in Netherlands | 40 , range 16–56 | No history yet | 22% | 7% | None | First reading | |
 Shopify CA | #3 in website builders in Netherlands#1 in e-commerce platforms in Netherlands | 69 , range 61–76 | No history yet | 52% | 29% | | First reading | |
| | #1 in project management tools in Netherlands | 72 , range 59–80 | No history yet | 74% | 43% | | First reading | |
| | #1 in website builders in Netherlands | 80 , range 62–87 | No history yet | 67% | 45% | | First reading | |
| | #1 in customer support tools in Netherlands | 51 , range 28–72 | No history yet | 43% | 16% | None | First reading | |
| | #2 in password managers in Netherlands | 69 , range 51–79 | No history yet | 53% | 31% | None | First reading | |
| | #2 in e-signature tools in Netherlands | 57 , range 46–71 | No history yet | 65% | 24% | None | First reading |
This list spans more than one industry, so each brand shows its place in its own. Every brand named in at least three answers is placed. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Social | 7.3% | 3 of 4 | 139 | Not read |
| 2 | | Vendor site | 6.0% | 4 of 4 | 90 | 12 |
| 3 | | Brand site | 3.9% | 4 of 4 | 54 | 4 |
| 4 | | Community | 6.4% | 3 of 4 | 74 | 36 |
| 5 | | Brand site | 3.2% | 4 of 4 | 49 | 4 |
| 6 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 7 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 8 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 9 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 10 | | Regulator | 3.2% | 4 of 4 | 26 | 2 |
The questions, and who wins each
| Question | Language | Wins it |
|---|---|---|
| Wat zijn de beste tools voor marketingautomatisering voor kleine teams? | Dutch | |
| Hoe kunnen marketingteams e-mailcampagnes automatiseren? | Dutch | No brand recommended |
| Hoe kan een marketingteam e-mails versturen op basis van klantgedrag? | Dutch | No brand recommended |
| Hoe kan ik leads volgen vanaf het eerste contact tot aan een verkoop? | Dutch | No brand recommended |
| Zijn handmatige e-mailcampagnes of automatisering beter voor kleine bedrijven? | Dutch | No brand recommended |
| Is het voor B2B-teams beter om leads in spreadsheets bij te houden of automatisering te gebruiken? | Dutch | No brand recommended |
| Wat zijn voor kleine teams goede alternatieven voor handmatig e-mails versturen? | Dutch | |
| Wat zijn voor B2B-bedrijven goede alternatieven voor spreadsheets om leads bij te houden? | Dutch | |
| Ik heb een klein bedrijf en wil e-mails automatiseren zonder technische specialist. | Dutch | |
| Ik ben verantwoordelijk voor marketing bij een B2B-bedrijf en zoek een manier om leads bij te houden. | Dutch | |
Industries
Method
For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.