Most cited source
311citations
From Google AI Mode, Gemini and Google AI Overviews
AI visibility in France
Explore brands in industry panels measured from France.
Where engines disagree most
Not compared
A list across industries has no engine top three.
Brands
| Brand | Place in its industry | Heralded Score | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Unranked in project management tools in France | Too few answers | No history yet | 1% | 1% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in project management tools in France | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| ZEROLAG | Unranked in cloud hosting platforms in France | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in VPNs in France | Too few answers | No history yet | 1% | 1% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in website builders in France | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in e-signature tools in France | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in CRM tools in France | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in marketing automation tools in France | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in e-commerce platforms in France | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in marketing automation tools in France | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading |
This list spans more than one industry, so each brand shows its place in its own. Every brand named in at least three answers is placed. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | | Regulator | 1.4% | 3 of 4 | 11 | 2 |
| 12 | | Consultancy | 2.1% | 3 of 4 | 14 | 37 |
| 13 | | Media | 1.9% | 3 of 4 | 15 | 13 |
| 14 | | Media | 2.2% | 4 of 4 | 7 | 35 |
| 15 | | Regulator | 1.7% | 3 of 4 | 13 | 3 |
| 16 | | Media | 1.8% | 4 of 4 | 15 | 42 |
| 17 | | Review site | 1.5% | 4 of 4 | 16 | 13 |
| 18 | | Media | 1.5% | 3 of 4 | 8 | 29 |
| 19 | | Regulator | 0.7% | 1 of 4 | 15 | Not read |
| 20 | | Directory | 1.2% | 3 of 4 | 9 | 28 |
The questions, and who wins each
| Question | Language | Wins it |
|---|---|---|
| best e-signature tools for small businesses | English | |
| sign contracts online for small business clients | English | |
| how can a small business get customer contracts signed faster | English | |
| how to collect signatures on agreements without printing | English | |
| digital signatures vs signing paper contracts for small businesses | English | No brand recommended |
Industries
Method
For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.