Leader
59Heralded Score, range 46–72
The most visible workflow automation and AI agent platforms in France, October 2026
Most cited source
32citations
From Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT
Where engines disagree most
3/4engines put it in their top three
Top three on Gemini, Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT, not on Google AI Mode
Brands
Search is not measured for this board yet, so it ranks on AI answers.
| Rank | Brand | Rank change | Heralded Score All | AI | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | New entry | 59 , range 46–72 | 59#1 | 59
| 58% | 33% | | First reading | |
| 2 | | New entry | 57 , range 45–71 | 57#2 | 57
| 57% | 32% | | First reading | |
| 3 | | New entry | 55 , range 44–70 | 55#3 | 55
| 56% | 29% | | First reading | |
| 4 | | New entry | 46 , range 37–59 | 46#4 | 46
| 39% | 27% | | First reading | |
| 5 | | New entry | 31 , range 10–40 | 31#5 | 31
| 17% | 11% | | First reading | |
| 6 | | New entry | 9 , range 4–33 | 9#6 | 9
| 14% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| 7 | | New entry | 8 , range 3–32 | 8#7 | 8
| 7% | 5% | None | First reading | |
| 8 | | New entry | 7 , range 2–31 | 7#8 | 7
| 8% | 2% | None | First reading | |
| 9 | | New entry | 6 , range 2–31 | 6#9 | 6
| 7% | 3% | | First reading | |
| 10 | | New entry | 5 , range 2–30 | 5#10 | 5
| 8% | 0% | None | First reading |
“=” marks brands whose score ranges overlap, so the test cannot separate them. Every brand named in at least three answers is ranked. AI gives each brand’s score and rank from the engines’ answers; Search is not measured for this board yet. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Social | 25.0% | 3 of 4 | 29 | Not read |
| 2 | | Vendor site | 6.7% | 2 of 4 | 3 | 3 |
| 3 | | Community | 8.3% | 3 of 4 | 6 | Not read |
| 4 | | Vendor site | 3.3% | 1 of 4 | 5 | Not read |
| 5 | | Vendor site | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 5 | Not read |
| 6 | | Reference | 5.0% | 1 of 4 | 2 | 10 |
| 7 | | Consultancy | 5.0% | 3 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 8 | | Regulator | 5.0% | 2 of 4 | 3 | Not read |
| 9 | | Industry authority | 3.3% | 2 of 4 | 3 | Not read |
| 10 | | Regulator | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 3 | Not read |
Questions asked
| Question | Language | Most recommended |
|---|---|---|
| best workflow automation tools for small businesses | English | |
| ai agent platform for business automation | English | |
| how to automate repetitive tasks across business apps | English | |
| how to build ai agents without coding | English | |
| robotic process automation vs ai agents | English | No brand recommended |
Each engine's top three
Related leaderboards
Method
Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.
For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.