Leader
45Heralded Score, range 37–58
The most visible vulnerability scanners in Romania, October 2026
Most cited source
35citations
From ChatGPT
Where engines disagree most
1/4engines put it in their top three
Top three on Gemini, not on Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT
Brands
Search is not measured for this board yet, so it ranks on AI answers.
| Rank | Brand | Rank change | Heralded Score All | AI | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | –
| 1% | 0% | | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading |
“=” marks brands whose score ranges overlap, so the test cannot separate them. Every brand named in at least three answers is ranked. AI gives each brand’s score and rank from the engines’ answers; Search is not measured for this board yet. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | | Community | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 12 | | Vendor site | 3.3% | 2 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 13 | | Community | 3.3% | 1 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 14 | | Reference | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 15 | | Vendor site | 3.3% | 2 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 16 | | Media | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 17 | | Directory | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
| 18 | | Review site | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
| 19 | | Vendor site | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
| 20 | | Vendor site | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
Questions asked
| Question | Language | Most recommended |
|---|---|---|
| Ce scanner de vulnerabilități ar trebui să folosească o echipă de securitate pentru a găsi defecte software? | Romanian | |
| Ce instrument poate scana aplicațiile noastre pentru a identifica vulnerabilități de securitate? | Romanian | |
| Cum pot echipele mici de inginerie să scaneze codul pentru vulnerabilități? | Romanian | |
| Ce îi poate ajuta pe dezvoltatori să găsească vulnerabilități înainte de lansare? | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| Cum pot identifica vulnerabilitățile din toate aplicațiile noastre? | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| Cum putem depista problemele de securitate din cod înainte de implementare? | Romanian | |
| Cum poate echipa mea să găsească și să prioritizeze vulnerabilitățile software? | Romanian | |
| Cum verific dacă software-ul nostru are vulnerabilități cunoscute? | Romanian | |
| Ar trebui să scanăm codul sursă sau aplicațiile în execuție pentru vulnerabilități? | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| Ce funcționează mai bine pentru găsirea defectelor: revizuirile manuale sau scanările automate? | Romanian | No brand recommended |
Each engine's top three
Google AI Mode
No brand named in at least three answers.
Gemini
- 1
Snyk
- 2
OWASP ZAP
- 3
Burp Suite
Google AI Overviews
- 1
- 2
Trivy
- 3
Tenable Nessus
ChatGPT
Related leaderboards
Method
Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.
For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.