Leader
39Heralded Score, range 37–43
The most visible vulnerability scanners in Europe, October 2026
Most cited source
228citations
From Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT
Where engines disagree most
1/4engines put it in their top three
Top three on Google AI Mode, not on Gemini, Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT
Brands
Search is not measured for this board yet, so it ranks on AI answers.
| Rank | Brand | Rank change | Heralded Score All | AI | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | New entry | 39 , range 37–43 | 39#1 | 39
| 39% | 11% | | First reading | |
| 2 | | New entry | 37 , range 34–41 | 37#2 | 37
| 33% | 11% | | First reading | |
| 3 | | New entry | 32 , range 30–35 | 32#3 | 32
| 26% | 5% | | First reading | |
| 4 | | New entry | 22 , range 12–31 | 22#4 | 22
| 18% | 3% | | First reading | |
| 5 | | New entry | 10 , range 7–22 | 10#5 | 10
| 12% | 4% | | First reading | |
| 6 | | New entry | 9 , range 7–20 | 9#6 | 9
| 11% | 4% | None | First reading | |
| 7 | | New entry | 8 , range 6–14 | 8#7 | 8
| 10% | 2% | | First reading | |
| 8 | | New entry | 6 , range 4–9 | 6#8 | 6
| 8% | 1% | | First reading | |
| 9 | | New entry | 6 , range 4–9 | 6#9 | 6
| 7% | 1% | None | First reading | |
| 10 | | New entry | 6 , range 4–9 | 6#10 | 6
| 6% | 2% | None | First reading |
“=” marks brands whose score ranges overlap, so the test cannot separate them. Every brand named in at least three answers is ranked. AI gives each brand’s score and rank from the engines’ answers; Search is not measured for this board yet. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Community | 21.0% | 3 of 4 | 57 | 7 |
| 2 | | Community | 10.7% | 1 of 4 | 27 | 13 |
| 3 | | Community | 6.7% | 3 of 4 | 25 | 4 |
| 4 | | Community | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 9 | Not read |
| 5 | | Community | 2.9% | 2 of 4 | 7 | Not read |
| 6 | | Community | 1.4% | 2 of 4 | 6 | Not read |
| 7 | | Community | 1.4% | 1 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 8 | | Community | 0.7% | 1 of 4 | 3 | Not read |
| 9 |  wordpress.com | Community | 1.0% | 1 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 10 | | Community | 0.7% | 1 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
Questions asked
| Question | Language | Most recommended |
|---|---|---|
| Quel scanner de vulnérabilités une équipe de sécurité devrait-elle utiliser pour détecter les failles logicielles ? | French | |
| Quel outil peut analyser nos applications pour détecter les vulnérabilités ? | French | |
| Comment les petites équipes d’ingénierie peuvent-elles analyser leur code pour y détecter des vulnérabilités ? | French | |
| Qu’est-ce qui peut aider les développeurs à détecter les vulnérabilités avant la mise en production ? | French | No brand recommended |
| Comment détecter les vulnérabilités dans l’ensemble de nos applications ? | French | No brand recommended |
| Comment détecter les failles de sécurité dans le code avant le déploiement ? | French | No brand recommended |
| Comment mon équipe peut-elle détecter et prioriser les vulnérabilités logicielles ? | French | No brand recommended |
| Comment vérifier si notre logiciel présente des vulnérabilités connues ? | French | |
| Faut-il analyser le code source ou les applications en cours d’exécution pour détecter les vulnérabilités ? | French | No brand recommended |
| Qu’est-ce qui fonctionne le mieux pour détecter les failles : les revues manuelles ou les analyses automatisées ? | French | No brand recommended |
Each engine's top three
Google AI Mode
- 1
Snyk
- 2
Orca Security
- 3
Aikido Security
Gemini
- 1
- 2
OWASP ZAP
- 3
Burp Suite
Google AI Overviews
ChatGPT
Related leaderboards
Method
Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.
For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.