The most visible vulnerability scanners in Europe, October 2026

October 2026 · 105 questions asked from 7 countries · ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode · 420 answers read

Leader

Snyk

39Heralded Score, range 37–43

Most cited source

owasp.org

228citations

From Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT

Where engines disagree most

Orca Security

1/4engines put it in their top three

Top three on Google AI Mode, not on Gemini, Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT

Brands

Search is not measured for this board yet, so it ranks on AI answers.

Rank Brand Rank change Heralded Score All AI Score trend Mentioned Recommended By engine Mentioned by Change
1 Snyk GB New entry 39 , range 37–43 39#1
39
  • : score 39 · #1
39% 11% First reading
2 OWASP ZAP US New entry 37 , range 34–41 37#2
37
  • : score 37 · #2
33% 11% First reading
3 Trivy IL New entry 32 , range 30–35 32#3
32
  • : score 32 · #3
26% 5% First reading
4 Burp Suite GB New entry 22 , range 12–31 22#4
22
  • : score 22 · #4
18% 3% First reading
5 Tenable Nessus US New entry 10 , range 7–22 10#5
10
  • : score 10 · #5
12% 4% First reading
6 Tenable Vulnerability Management US New entry 9 , range 7–20 9#6
9
  • : score 9 · #6
11% 4% None First reading
7 Qualys US New entry 8 , range 6–14 8#7
8
  • : score 8 · #7
10% 2% First reading
8 Tenable One US New entry 6 , range 4–9 6#8
6
  • : score 6 · #8
8% 1% First reading
9 Veracode US New entry 6 , range 4–9 6#9
6
  • : score 6 · #9
7% 1% First reading
10 Greenbone OpenVAS DE New entry 6 , range 4–9 6#10
6
  • : score 6 · #10
6% 2% First reading

“=” marks brands whose score ranges overlap, so the test cannot separate them. Every brand named in at least three answers is ranked. AI gives each brand’s score and rank from the engines’ answers; Search is not measured for this board yet. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.

Most cited sources

Rank Source Type Cited in Engines Pages cited Brands its pages mention
1 owasp.org Community 21.0% 3 of 4 57 7
2 github.com Vendor site 14.3% 2 of 4 61 12
3 nist.gov Regulator 12.4% 3 of 4 25 1
4 owasp.github.io Community 10.7% 1 of 4 27 13
5 youtube.com Social 7.4% 2 of 4 37 Not read
6 cisa.gov Regulator 4.0% 1 of 4 8 Not read
7 reddit.com Community 6.7% 3 of 4 25 4
8 semgrep.dev Vendor site 6.4% 1 of 4 6 Not read
9 defectdojo.com Vendor site 1.7% 1 of 4 9 Not read
10 checkmarx.com Vendor site 4.3% 3 of 4 8 Not read

Questions asked

QuestionLanguageMost recommended
Ce scanner de vulnerabilități ar trebui să folosească o echipă de securitate pentru a găsi defecte software? Romanian Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP and Snyk, tied
Ce instrument poate scana aplicațiile noastre pentru a identifica vulnerabilități de securitate? Romanian OWASP ZAP and Snyk, tied
Cum pot echipele mici de inginerie să scaneze codul pentru vulnerabilități? Romanian Snyk
Ce îi poate ajuta pe dezvoltatori să găsească vulnerabilități înainte de lansare? Romanian No brand recommended
Cum pot identifica vulnerabilitățile din toate aplicațiile noastre? Romanian No brand recommended
Cum putem depista problemele de securitate din cod înainte de implementare? Romanian OWASP ZAP
Cum poate echipa mea să găsească și să prioritizeze vulnerabilitățile software? Romanian OWASP ZAP
Cum verific dacă software-ul nostru are vulnerabilități cunoscute? Romanian OWASP ZAP
Ar trebui să scanăm codul sursă sau aplicațiile în execuție pentru vulnerabilități? Romanian No brand recommended
Ce funcționează mai bine pentru găsirea defectelor: revizuirile manuale sau scanările automate? Romanian No brand recommended

Each engine's top three

Method

Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.

For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.

How the leaderboards are measured