Most cited source
51citations
From Google AI Mode
B2C brands by AI visibility in their industry on Google AI Mode in Romania, October 2026
Where engines disagree most
Not compared
A list across industries has no engine top three.
Brands
| Brand | Place in its industry | Heralded Score | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | #7 in banks in Romania | 41 , range 30–63 | 45% | 9% | | First reading | |
| | #7 in cloud hosting platforms in Romania | 32 , range 18–46 | 20% | 13% | | First reading | |
| | #7 in e-signature tools in Romania | 32 , range 22–44 | 33% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | #7 in cloud hosting platforms in Romania | 32 , range 19–46 | 27% | 7% | None | First reading | |
| | #7 in endpoint security tools in Romania | 17 , range 5–36 | 10% | 3% | | First reading | |
| | Unranked in European neobanks in Romania#8 in banks in Romania | 31 , range 20–41 | 21% | 10% | | First reading | |
| | #8 in project management tools in Romania | 17 , range 5–36 | 10% | 3% | | First reading | |
| | #8 in project management tools in Romania | 17 , range 5–36 | 10% | 3% | None | First reading | |
| | #9 in e-signature tools in Romania | 23 , range 12–40 | 10% | 10% | None | First reading | |
| | #10 in banks in Romania | 33 , range 19–50 | 27% | 9% | None | First reading |
This list spans more than one industry, so each brand shows its place in its own. Every brand named in at least three answers is placed. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Social | 9.1% | 1 of 4 | 39 | 15 |
| 2 | | Community | 9.6% | 1 of 4 | 31 | 40 |
| 3 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 4 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 5 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 6 | | Consultancy | 2.6% | 1 of 4 | 4 | 0 |
| 7 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 8 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 9 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 10 | | Brand site | 2.6% | 1 of 4 | 9 | 1 |
The questions, and who wins each
| Question | Language | Wins it |
|---|---|---|
| cel mai bun software de suport clienți pentru echipele de suport | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| instrumente de suport clienți pentru echipele mici | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| cum poate o echipă de suport să răspundă mai repede clienților | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| cum să gestionezi solicitările clienților fără să pierzi niciun mesaj | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| suport clienți prin e-mail sau chat pentru echipe mici | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| suport clienți automatizat sau gestionat manual pentru echipe | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| alternative la gestionarea solicitărilor clienților prin e-mail | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| alternative la răspunsul manual la întrebările clienților | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| sunt manager de suport într-o echipă de 3 persoane; cum gestionăm mai multe solicitări | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| conduc o firmă mică și vreau să răspund clienților de pe e-mail și chat | Romanian | No brand recommended |
Related leaderboards
Method
Each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.