Most cited source
773citations
From Google AI Mode, Gemini and Google AI Overviews
Most visible Romanian brands in AI
Romanian brands across Global industry panels, ordered by their strongest industry score.
Where engines disagree most
Not compared
A list across industries has no engine top three.
Brands
| Brand | Place in its industry | Heralded Score | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | #2 in antivirus apps#5 in endpoint security tools | 50 , range 44–60 | No history yet | 48% | 30% | | First reading | |
| | #6 in automation platforms | 10 , range 5–31 | No history yet | 11% | 4% | None | First reading | |
| | #8 in VPNs | 8 , range 4–30 | No history yet | 9% | 3% | | First reading | |
| | #11 in vulnerability scanners | 3 , range 2–9 | No history yet | 4% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | #11 in DLP tools | 2 , range 1–13 | No history yet | 3% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in merchant of record platforms | Too few answers | No history yet | 2% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in password managers | Too few answers | No history yet | 2% | 0% | | First reading | |
| | Unranked in car brands | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in book summary apps | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in conversational AI platforms | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading |
This list spans more than one industry, so each brand shows its place in its own. Every brand named in at least three answers is placed. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 12 | | Brand site | 2.4% | 4 of 4 | 61 | 0 |
| 13 | | Community | 1.3% | 3 of 4 | 40 | 0 |
| 14 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 15 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 16 | | Community | 2.0% | 2 of 4 | 59 | 0 |
| 17 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 18 | | Reference | 2.3% | 3 of 4 | 12 | 0 |
| 19 | | Brand site | 1.5% | 4 of 4 | 29 | 0 |
| 20 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
The questions, and who wins each
| Question | Language | Wins it |
|---|---|---|
| how can we tell a real customer from a fraudster during a login | English | No brand recommended |
| how do i flag suspicious sessions without relying only on passwords | English | No brand recommended |
| how can my team spot automated attacks by analyzing how people use a site | English | No brand recommended |
| behavioral signals or device checks for detecting account takeover | English | No brand recommended |
| passive user behavior analysis or extra login verification for fraud prevention | English | No brand recommended |
| how does behavioral biometrics compare with device fingerprinting for spotting fraud | English | No brand recommended |
| can user behavior analysis reduce account takeover without adding login steps | English | No brand recommended |
| what can replace manual reviews of suspicious customer logins | English | No brand recommended |
| how can we replace one-time codes with passive checks for risky logins | English | No brand recommended |
| what can replace rules based only on device and location for fraud detection | English | No brand recommended |
Method
Each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.