Most cited source
773citations
From Google AI Mode, Gemini and Google AI Overviews
Most visible Romanian brands in AI
Romanian brands across Global industry panels, ordered by their strongest industry score.
Where engines disagree most
Not compared
A list across industries has no engine top three.
Brands
| Brand | Place in its industry | Heralded Score | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | #2 in antivirus apps#5 in endpoint security tools | 50 , range 44–60 | No history yet | 48% | 30% | | First reading | |
| | #6 in automation platforms | 10 , range 5–31 | No history yet | 11% | 4% | None | First reading | |
| | #8 in VPNs | 8 , range 4–30 | No history yet | 9% | 3% | None | First reading | |
| | #11 in vulnerability scanners | 3 , range 2–9 | No history yet | 4% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | #11 in DLP tools | 2 , range 1–13 | No history yet | 3% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in merchant of record platforms | Too few answers | No history yet | 2% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in password managers | Too few answers | No history yet | 2% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in car brands | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in book summary apps | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in conversational AI platforms | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading |
This list spans more than one industry, so each brand shows its place in its own. Every brand named in at least three answers is placed. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Review site | 5.9% | 4 of 4 | 106 | 0 |
| 2 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 3 | | Review site | 1.3% | 3 of 4 | 27 | 0 |
| 4 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 5 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 6 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 7 | | Review site | 0.6% | 2 of 4 | 15 | 0 |
| 8 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 9 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 10 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
The questions, and who wins each
| Question | Language | Wins it |
|---|---|---|
| accounting software for construction | English | No brand recommended |
| most reliable accounting software | English | No brand recommended |
| accounting software with the best support | English | No brand recommended |
| which accounting software do experts recommend | English | No brand recommended |
| best e-signature software for a professional services company | English | No brand recommended |
| e-signature software recommendations for a legal operations lead | English | No brand recommended |
| top e-signature software | English | No brand recommended |
| how to choose e-signature software | English | No brand recommended |
| what to look for in e-signature software | English | No brand recommended |
| e-signature software for a team of 20 to 200 | English | No brand recommended |
Method
Each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.