Most cited source
773citations
From Google AI Mode, Gemini and Google AI Overviews
Most visible Romanian brands in AI
Romanian brands across Global industry panels, ordered by their strongest industry score.
Where engines disagree most
Not compared
A list across industries has no engine top three.
Brands
| Brand | Place in its industry | Heralded Score | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | #2 in antivirus apps#5 in endpoint security tools | 50 , range 44–60 | No history yet | 48% | 30% | None | First reading | |
| | #6 in automation platforms | 10 , range 5–31 | No history yet | 11% | 4% | | First reading | |
| | #8 in VPNs | 8 , range 4–30 | No history yet | 9% | 3% | None | First reading | |
| | #11 in vulnerability scanners | 3 , range 2–9 | No history yet | 4% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | #11 in DLP tools | 2 , range 1–13 | No history yet | 3% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in merchant of record platforms | Too few answers | No history yet | 2% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in password managers | Too few answers | No history yet | 2% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in car brands | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in book summary apps | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in conversational AI platforms | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading |
This list spans more than one industry, so each brand shows its place in its own. Every brand named in at least three answers is placed. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Vendor site | 7.6% | 4 of 4 | 440 | 0 |
| 2 | | Vendor site | 5.2% | 4 of 4 | 152 | 0 |
| 3 | | Vendor site | 4.8% | 4 of 4 | 41 | 1 |
| 4 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 5 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 6 | | Vendor site | 0.8% | 3 of 4 | 27 | 0 |
| 7 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 8 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 9 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 10 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
The questions, and who wins each
| Question | Language | Wins it |
|---|---|---|
| is it better to block data transfers or alert security teams | English | No brand recommended |
| how do companies prevent data leaks across email, browsers, and file storage | English | No brand recommended |
| can one policy protect sensitive data on laptops and in cloud services | English | No brand recommended |
| what can replace manual checks for employees sharing confidential files | English | No brand recommended |
| how can we replace separate rules for email and endpoint data leaks | English | No brand recommended |
| what can replace blocking every file upload to prevent data leaks | English | No brand recommended |
| best endpoint security software for a mid-market company | English | |
| endpoint security software recommendations for a CISO | English | |
| top endpoint security software | English | |
| how to choose endpoint security software | English | No brand recommended |
Method
Each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.