Most cited source
773citations
From Google AI Mode, Gemini and Google AI Overviews
Most visible Romanian brands in AI
Romanian brands across Global industry panels, ordered by their strongest industry score.
Where engines disagree most
Not compared
A list across industries has no engine top three.
Brands
| Brand | Place in its industry | Heralded Score | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | #2 in antivirus apps#5 in endpoint security tools | 50 , range 44–60 | No history yet | 48% | 30% | | First reading | |
| | #6 in automation platforms | 10 , range 5–31 | No history yet | 11% | 4% | None | First reading | |
| | #8 in VPNs | 8 , range 4–30 | No history yet | 9% | 3% | | First reading | |
| | #11 in vulnerability scanners | 3 , range 2–9 | No history yet | 4% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | #11 in DLP tools | 2 , range 1–13 | No history yet | 3% | 0% | | First reading | |
| | Unranked in merchant of record platforms | Too few answers | No history yet | 2% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in password managers | Too few answers | No history yet | 2% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in car brands | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | | First reading | |
| | Unranked in book summary apps | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in conversational AI platforms | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading |
This list spans more than one industry, so each brand shows its place in its own. Every brand named in at least three answers is placed. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Community | 12.9% | 4 of 4 | 249 | 5 |
| 2 | | Community | 1.3% | 3 of 4 | 40 | 0 |
| 3 | | Community | 2.0% | 2 of 4 | 59 | 0 |
| 4 | | Community | 1.0% | 3 of 4 | 28 | 0 |
| 5 | | Community | 0.4% | 3 of 4 | 4 | 0 |
| 6 | | Community | 0.3% | 2 of 4 | 9 | 0 |
| 7 | | Community | 0.1% | 1 of 4 | 8 | 0 |
| 8 | | Community | 0.3% | 1 of 4 | 8 | 0 |
| 9 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 10 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
The questions, and who wins each
| Question | Language | Wins it |
|---|---|---|
| how can a fintech connect mobile banking to card payments and transfers | English | No brand recommended |
| how do we replace outdated banking software without disrupting customers | English | No brand recommended |
| one platform for mobile banking or separate systems for accounts and payments | English | No brand recommended |
| should a fintech use a banking platform or build account services in house | English | No brand recommended |
| centralized banking platform or separate systems for each country | English | No brand recommended |
| what can replace a bank's legacy system for mobile account opening | English | No brand recommended |
| how can a fintech move from spreadsheets to automated account operations | English | No brand recommended |
| i lead technology at a bank and need to launch mobile accounts with our existing core | English | No brand recommended |
| i run a fintech and need to offer accounts and debit cards in several countries | English | No brand recommended |
| what antivirus app should i use to protect my windows laptop from malware | English | |
Method
Each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.