Most cited source
773citations
From Google AI Mode, Gemini and Google AI Overviews
Most visible Romanian brands in AI
Romanian brands across Global industry panels, ordered by their strongest industry score.
Where engines disagree most
Not compared
A list across industries has no engine top three.
Brands
| Brand | Place in its industry | Heralded Score | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Unranked in DLP tools | Too few answers | No history yet | 1% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in digital banking platforms | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in digital banking platforms | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in DLP tools | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| Nexus RO | Unranked in HR and payroll tools | Too few answers | No history yet | 2% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in equity crowdfunding platforms | Too few answers | No history yet | 2% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in behavioral biometrics tools | Too few answers | No history yet | 0% | 0% | None | First reading |
This list spans more than one industry, so each brand shows its place in its own. Every brand named in at least three answers is placed. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 12 | | Brand site | 2.4% | 4 of 4 | 61 | 0 |
| 13 | | Community | 1.3% | 3 of 4 | 40 | 0 |
| 14 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 15 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 16 | | Community | 2.0% | 2 of 4 | 59 | 0 |
| 17 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 18 | | Reference | 2.3% | 3 of 4 | 12 | 0 |
| 19 | | Brand site | 1.5% | 4 of 4 | 29 | 0 |
| 20 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
The questions, and who wins each
| Question | Language | Wins it |
|---|---|---|
| how do we catch security flaws in code before deployment | English | No brand recommended |
| how can my team find and prioritize software vulnerabilities | English | No brand recommended |
| how do i check whether our software has known vulnerabilities | English | No brand recommended |
| should we scan source code or running applications for vulnerabilities | English | No brand recommended |
| what works better for finding flaws, manual reviews or automated scans | English | No brand recommended |
| how do application scans compare with dependency checks for finding vulnerabilities | English | No brand recommended |
| should developers or security teams own vulnerability scanning | English | No brand recommended |
| what can replace manual security checks before each software release | English | No brand recommended |
| how can we replace spreadsheets for tracking software vulnerabilities | English | No brand recommended |
| what can replace separate scanners for code and dependencies | English | No brand recommended |
Method
Each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.