Leader
71Heralded Score, range 58–75
The most visible headless CMS platforms in Europe, October 2026
Most cited source
2citations
From Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews
Where engines disagree most
They agree
Every engine names the same top three.
Brands
| Rank | Brand | Rank change | Heralded Score All | AI | Search | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | New entry | 71 , range 58–75 | 72#1 | 70#3 | 71
| 55% | 25% | None | First reading | |
| 2 | | New entry | 71 , range 67–75 | 70#2 | 72#1 | 71
| 57% | 24% | None | First reading | |
| 3 | | New entry | 70 , range 63–74 | 69#3 | 71#2 | 70
| 57% | 21% | None | First reading | |
| 4 | | New entry | 53 , range 43–67 | 57#4 | 45#4 | 53
| 39% | 22% | None | First reading | |
| 5 | | New entry | 36 , range 26–54 | 39#5 | 31#7 | 36
| 20% | 13% | None | First reading | |
| 6 | | New entry | 32 , range 21–49 | 32#6 | 32#6 | 32
| 15% | 7% | None | First reading | |
| 7 | | New entry | 28 , range 14–47 | 26#7 | 32#5 | 28
| 12% | 5% | None | First reading | |
| 8 | | New entry | 16 , range 8–41 | 11#8 | 24#9 | 16
| 11% | 2% | None | First reading | |
| 9 | | New entry | 13 , range 6–32 | 6#9 | 25#8 | 13
| 6% | 2% | None | First reading | |
| 10 | | New entry | 9 , range 3–29 | 2#13 | 21#10 | 9
| 3% | 1% | None | First reading |
“=” marks brands whose score ranges overlap, so the test cannot separate them. Every brand named in at least three answers is ranked. AI and Search give each brand’s score and rank on that side alone. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Reference | 0.5% | 2 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
| 2 | | Reference | 0.5% | 1 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
| 3 | | Reference | 0.5% | 1 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 4 | | Reference | 0.2% | 1 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
| 5 | | Reference | 0.2% | 1 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
Questions asked
| Question | Language | Most recommended |
|---|---|---|
| best headless cms for developers | English | |
| headless cms for ecommerce websites | English | |
| how to manage content for a website and mobile app in one place | English | |
| how to migrate from a traditional cms to a headless cms | English | No brand recommended |
| headless cms vs traditional cms for marketing teams | English | No brand recommended |
| Wat is het beste headless CMS voor een marketingwebsite? | Dutch | |
| Headless contentmanagement voor ontwikkelteams | Dutch | |
| Hoe kan een bedrijf dezelfde content publiceren op zijn website en in zijn mobiele app? | Dutch | |
| Hoe geef ik marketeers de mogelijkheid om content te bewerken op een website die met een JavaScript-framework is gebouwd? | Dutch | |
| Traditioneel CMS of headless CMS voor een groeiende bedrijfswebsite? | Dutch | No brand recommended |
Each engine's top three
Google AI Mode
- = 1
Sanity
- = 1
Strapi
- 3
Contentful
Gemini
- 1
- 2
- 3
Google AI Overviews
- 1
- 2
- 3
ChatGPT
- 1
- 2
- 3
Related leaderboards
Method
Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.
For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.