Most cited source
82citations
From ChatGPT
Brands by AI visibility in their industry on ChatGPT, October 2026
Where engines disagree most
Not compared
A list across industries has no engine top three.
Brands
| Brand | Place in its industry | Heralded Score | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | #13 in endpoint security tools | 16 , range 3–37 | 13% | 0% | | First reading | |
| | #13 in endpoint security tools | 16 , range 3–37 | 13% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | #14 in CRM tools | 16 , range 3–37 | 13% | 0% | | First reading | |
| | Unranked in business intelligence toolsUnranked in accounting toolsUnranked in ERP tools | 10 , range 2–22 | 4% | 1% | | First reading | |
| | Unranked in HR and payroll tools | Too few answers | 10% | 10% | | First reading | |
| | Unranked in customer support tools | Too few answers | 4% | 4% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in project management tools | Too few answers | 0% | 0% | | First reading | |
| | Unranked in HR and payroll tools | Too few answers | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in customer support tools | Too few answers | 4% | 4% | | First reading | |
| | Unranked in CRM tools | Too few answers | 0% | 0% | None | First reading |
This list spans more than one industry, so each brand shows its place in its own. Every brand named in at least three answers is placed. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Review site | 13.0% | 1 of 4 | 30 | 0 |
| 2 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 3 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 4 | | Review site | 2.6% | 1 of 4 | 10 | 0 |
| 5 | | Review site | 1.3% | 1 of 4 | 5 | 0 |
| 6 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 7 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 8 | | Review site | 1.6% | 1 of 4 | 4 | 0 |
| 9 | | Review site | 1.3% | 1 of 4 | 3 | 0 |
| 10 | | Review site | 0.6% | 1 of 4 | 1 | 0 |
The questions, and who wins each
| Question | Language | Wins it |
|---|---|---|
| best endpoint security software for a mid-market company | English | |
| endpoint security software recommendations for a CISO | English | |
| top endpoint security software | English | |
| how to choose endpoint security software | English | No brand recommended |
| what to look for in endpoint security software | English | No brand recommended |
| endpoint security software for a team of 20 to 200 | English | |
| endpoint security software that integrates with Splunk | English | |
| endpoint security software with GDPR-compliant hosting | English | |
| endpoint security software for healthcare | English | |
| most reliable endpoint security software | English | |
Related leaderboards
Method
Each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.