Most cited source
253citations
From Gemini
British B2B brands by AI visibility in their industry on Gemini, October 2026
Where engines disagree most
Not compared
A list across industries has no engine top three.
Brands
| Brand | Place in its industry | Heralded Score | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | #1 in European neobanks | 68 , range 45–80 | 67% | 33% | None | First reading | |
| | #2 in accounting tools | 74 , range 52–85 | 71% | 46% | | First reading | |
| | #2 in European neobanks | 59 , range 40–77 | 46% | 42% | None | First reading | |
| | #4 in endpoint security tools | 72 , range 48–83 | 58% | 50% | | First reading | |
| | #5 in European neobanks | 30 , range 17–45 | 25% | 4% | None | First reading | |
| | #6 in European neobanks | 20 , range 10–40 | 13% | 4% | None | First reading | |
| | #7 in HR and payroll tools | 18 , range 10–41 | 15% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | #11 in cloud hosting platforms | 30 , range 15–46 | 17% | 13% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in CRM tools | Too few answers | 4% | 4% | | First reading | |
| | Unranked in ERP tools | Too few answers | 8% | 0% | None | First reading |
This list spans more than one industry, so each brand shows its place in its own. Every brand named in at least three answers is placed. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Vendor site | 28.3% | 1 of 4 | 253 | 0 |
| 2 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 3 | | Vendor site | 5.9% | 1 of 4 | 7 | 2 |
| 4 | | Industry authority | 3.9% | 1 of 4 | 5 | 1 |
| 5 | | Media | 3.9% | 1 of 4 | 7 | 1 |
| 6 | | Vendor site | 3.6% | 1 of 4 | 3 | 0 |
| 7 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 8 | | Community | 3.6% | 1 of 4 | 10 | 3 |
| 9 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 10 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
The questions, and who wins each
| Question | Language | Wins it |
|---|---|---|
| best endpoint security software for a mid-market company | English | |
| endpoint security software recommendations for a CISO | English | |
| top endpoint security software | English | |
| how to choose endpoint security software | English | |
| what to look for in endpoint security software | English | No brand recommended |
| endpoint security software for a team of 20 to 200 | English | |
| endpoint security software that integrates with Splunk | English | No brand recommended |
| endpoint security software with GDPR-compliant hosting | English | |
| endpoint security software for healthcare | English | No brand recommended |
| most reliable endpoint security software | English | |
Related leaderboards
Method
Each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.