Leader
14Heralded Score, range 4–50
The most visible behavioral biometrics tools in Romania, October 2026
Most cited source
26citations
From ChatGPT
Where engines disagree most
1/4engines put it in their top three
Top three on Google AI Mode, not on Gemini, Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT
Brands
| Rank | Brand | Rank change | Heralded Score All | AI | Search | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | New entry | 14 , range 4–50 | 23#1 | 0= #1 | 14
| 11% | 3% | | First reading | |
| 2 | | New entry | 7 , range 3–48 | 12#2 | 0= #1 | 7
| 9% | 1% | | First reading | |
| 3 | | New entry | 5 , range 2–47 | 8#3 | 0= #1 | 5
| 6% | 1% | | First reading | |
| 4 | | New entry | 5 , range 2–47 | 7#4 | 0= #1 | 5
| 6% | 1% | | First reading | |
| 5 | | New entry | 5 , range 2–47 | 7#5 | 0= #1 | 5
| 6% | 1% | None | First reading | |
| 6 | | New entry | 4 , range 1–46 | 6#6 | 0= #1 | 4
| 4% | 1% | | First reading | |
| 7 | | New entry | 3 , range 1–45 | 5#7 | 0= #1 | 3
| 5% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| 8 | | New entry | 3 , range 1–44 | 5#8 | 0= #1 | 3
| 5% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| 9 | | New entry | 2 , range 1–40 | 3#9 | 0= #1 | 2
| 3% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| 10 | | New entry | 1 , range 1–38 | 2#10 | 0= #1 | 1
| 2% | 0% | | First reading |
“=” marks brands whose score ranges overlap, so the test cannot separate them. Every brand named in at least three answers is ranked. AI and Search give each brand’s score and rank on that side alone. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Community | 15.0% | 1 of 4 | 11 | 2 |
| 2 | | Regulator | 13.3% | 1 of 4 | 10 | Not read |
| 3 | | Vendor site | 6.7% | 4 of 4 | 5 | Not read |
| 4 | | Social | 3.3% | 1 of 4 | 6 | Not read |
| 5 | | Regulator | 3.3% | 1 of 4 | 3 | Not read |
| 6 | | Regulator | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 5 | Not read |
| 7 | | Vendor site | 3.3% | 1 of 4 | 4 | Not read |
| 8 |  amazon.com | Vendor site | 3.3% | 1 of 4 | 3 | Not read |
| 9 | | Regulator | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 3 | Not read |
| 10 | | Regulator | 3.3% | 1 of 4 | 3 | Not read |
Questions asked
| Question | Language | Most recommended |
|---|---|---|
| how does behavioral biometrics compare with device fingerprinting for spotting fraud | English | No brand recommended |
| can user behavior analysis reduce account takeover without adding login steps | English | No brand recommended |
| what can replace manual reviews of suspicious customer logins | English | No brand recommended |
| how can we replace one-time codes with passive checks for risky logins | English | No brand recommended |
| what can replace rules based only on device and location for fraud detection | English | No brand recommended |
Each engine's top three
Google AI Mode
Gemini
- = 1
BioCatch
- = 1
LexisNexis Risk Solutions
- = 1
LexisNexis ThreatMetrix
Google AI Overviews
- = 1
- = 1
- = 1
DataDome
ChatGPT
No brand named in at least three answers.
Related leaderboards
Method
Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.
For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.