The most visible behavioral biometrics tools in Netherlands, October 2026

October 2026 · 15 questions asked from Netherlands in Dutch and English · ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode · 60 answers read

Leader

BioCatch

27Heralded Score, range 7–38

Most cited source

github.com

8citations

From ChatGPT

Where engines disagree most

DataDome

1/4engines put it in their top three

Top three on Gemini, not on Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT

Brands

Search is not measured for this board yet, so it ranks on AI answers.

Rank Brand Rank change Heralded Score All AI Score trend Mentioned Recommended By engine Mentioned by Change
1 BioCatch IL New entry 27 , range 7–38 27#1
27
  • : score 27 · #1
15% 9% First reading
2 LexisNexis Risk Solutions US New entry 13 , range 5–35 13#2
13
  • : score 13 · #2
15% 2% First reading
3 BehavioSec SE New entry 8 , range 3–33 8#3
8
  • : score 8 · #3
10% 2% First reading
4 ThreatMark CZ New entry 5 , range 1–30 5#4
5
  • : score 5 · #4
5% 2% None First reading
5 LexisNexis ThreatMetrix US New entry 4 , range 2–27 4#5
4
  • : score 4 · #5
7% 0% First reading
6 Feedzai PT New entry 4 , range 2–26 4#6
4
  • : score 4 · #6
7% 0% First reading
7 Sift US New entry 4 , range 2–26 4#7
4
  • : score 4 · #7
7% 0% None First reading
8 DataDome FR New entry 3 , range 1–22 3#8
3
  • : score 3 · #8
5% 0% None First reading
9 IBM Trusteer IL New entry 3 , range 1–19 3#9
3
  • : score 3 · #9
4% 0% None First reading
10 ARKOSE Labs US New entry 2 , range 1–18 2#10
2
  • : score 2 · #10
4% 0% None First reading

“=” marks brands whose score ranges overlap, so the test cannot separate them. Every brand named in at least three answers is ranked. AI gives each brand’s score and rank from the engines’ answers; Search is not measured for this board yet. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.

Most cited sources

Rank Source Type Cited in Engines Pages cited Brands its pages mention
1 github.com Vendor site 11.7% 1 of 4 6 Not read
2 oloid.com Vendor site 8.3% 3 of 4 1 3
3 seon.io Vendor site 5.0% 3 of 4 4 Not read
4 1kosmos.com Vendor site 5.0% 3 of 4 1 7
5 fingerprint.com Vendor site 3.3% 2 of 4 3 Not read
6 fraud.net Vendor site 5.0% 1 of 4 2 5
7 pingidentity.com Vendor site 5.0% 2 of 4 1 Not read
8 stripe.com Vendor site 5.0% 3 of 4 3 Not read
9 geetest.com Vendor site 3.3% 2 of 4 2 Not read
10 microblink.com Vendor site 3.3% 2 of 4 1 Not read

Questions asked

QuestionLanguageMost recommended
how does behavioral biometrics compare with device fingerprinting for spotting fraud English No brand recommended
can user behavior analysis reduce account takeover without adding login steps English No brand recommended
what can replace manual reviews of suspicious customer logins English No brand recommended
how can we replace one-time codes with passive checks for risky logins English No brand recommended
what can replace rules based only on device and location for fraud detection English No brand recommended

Each engine's top three

Google AI Mode

No brand named in at least three answers.

ChatGPT

No brand named in at least three answers.

Method

Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.

For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.

How the leaderboards are measured