Leader
18Heralded Score, range 6–36
The most visible behavioral biometrics tools in Italy, October 2026
Most cited source
26citations
From ChatGPT
Where engines disagree most
1/4engines put it in their top three
Top three on Gemini, not on Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT
Brands
Search is not measured for this board yet, so it ranks on AI answers.
| Rank | Brand | Rank change | Heralded Score All | AI | Score trend | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | EyesOnBio | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | –
| 2% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | –
| 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | FraudNet | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | –
| 0% | 0% | | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | –
| 0% | 0% | | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | –
| 4% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Unranked | Too few answers | Not measured | –
| 5% | 0% | None | First reading |
“=” marks brands whose score ranges overlap, so the test cannot separate them. Every brand named in at least three answers is ranked. AI gives each brand’s score and rank from the engines’ answers; Search is not measured for this board yet. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | | Regulator | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 3 | Not read |
| 12 | | Vendor site | 5.0% | 3 of 4 | 3 | Not read |
| 13 | | Vendor site | 5.0% | 1 of 4 | 3 | Not read |
| 14 | | Vendor site | 5.0% | 2 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 15 | | Vendor site | 5.0% | 2 of 4 | 3 | Not read |
| 16 | | Vendor site | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
| 17 | | Vendor site | 3.3% | 2 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 18 | | Vendor site | 3.3% | 1 of 4 | 1 | 4 |
| 19 | | Industry authority | 3.3% | 2 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
| 20 | | Reference | 1.7% | 1 of 4 | 2 | Not read |
Questions asked
| Question | Language | Most recommended |
|---|---|---|
| Quale software aiuta a rilevare il furto di account analizzando come gli utenti digitano e muovono il mouse? | Italian | |
| Quali strumenti possono individuare le frodi online analizzando il comportamento degli utenti? | Italian | |
| Come può una banca individuare gli accessi rischiosi senza creare disagi ai clienti? | Italian | No brand recommended |
| Cosa può aiutare un team e-commerce a rilevare bot e furti di account analizzando il comportamento degli utenti? | Italian | No brand recommended |
| Come posso rilevare il furto di account analizzando il modo in cui gli utenti digitano e usano il mouse? | Italian | No brand recommended |
| Come possiamo distinguere un cliente reale da un truffatore durante l'accesso? | Italian | No brand recommended |
| Come posso segnalare le sessioni sospette senza basarmi solo sulle password? | Italian | No brand recommended |
| Come può il mio team individuare gli attacchi automatizzati analizzando il modo in cui le persone usano un sito? | Italian | No brand recommended |
| Per rilevare il furto di account, meglio analizzare i comportamenti o controllare i dispositivi? | Italian | No brand recommended |
| Per prevenire le frodi, è meglio analizzare passivamente il comportamento degli utenti o richiedere un'ulteriore verifica all'accesso? | Italian | No brand recommended |
Each engine's top three
Google AI Mode
No brand named in at least three answers.
Gemini
Google AI Overviews
- 1
BioCatch
ChatGPT
No brand named in at least three answers.
Related leaderboards
Method
Each leaderboard ranks brands on two sides. AI is how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode answer the board's buyer questions. Search is Google's top 10 results for the keywords behind those questions. All combines the two, where Search is measured.
For the AI side, each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.