Leader
23%of answers name it
The most visible behavioral biometrics tools on Gemini, October 2026
Most cited source
6citations
From Gemini
Where engines disagree most
One engine
This page reads Gemini only. Set Engine to All to compare them.
Brands
| Rank | Brand | Heralded Score | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| = 1 | | 26 , range 14–45 | 23% | 0% | | First reading | |
| = 1 | | 26 , range 14–45 | 23% | 0% | | First reading | |
| 3 | | 23 , range 12–43 | 20% | 0% | | First reading | |
| 4 | | 17 , range 8–40 | 13% | 0% | | First reading | |
| 5 | | 14 , range 5–39 | 10% | 0% | | First reading | |
| – | | Too few answers | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Too few answers | 7% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Too few answers | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | Castle | Too few answers | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| – | | Too few answers | 0% | 0% | None | First reading |
“=” marks brands whose score ranges overlap, so the test cannot separate them. Every brand named in at least three answers is ranked. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Vendor site | 30.0% | 1 of 4 | 2 | 4 |
| 2 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 3 | | Industry authority | 15.0% | 1 of 4 | 1 | 5 |
| 4 | | Vendor site | 10.0% | 1 of 4 | 1 | Not read |
| 5 | | Vendor site | 10.0% | 1 of 4 | 1 | 0 |
| 6 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 7 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 8 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 9 | | Vendor site | 10.0% | 1 of 4 | 2 | 2 |
| 10 | | Vendor site | 10.0% | 1 of 4 | 1 | 7 |
The questions, and who wins each
| Question | Language | Wins it |
|---|---|---|
| what software helps detect account takeover from how users type and move | English | No brand recommended |
| which tools can spot online fraud by analyzing user behavior | English | No brand recommended |
| how can a bank identify risky logins without adding friction for customers | English | No brand recommended |
| what can help an ecommerce team detect bots and account takeover from user behavior | English | No brand recommended |
| how do i detect account takeover using typing and mouse behavior | English | No brand recommended |
| how can we tell a real customer from a fraudster during a login | English | No brand recommended |
| how do i flag suspicious sessions without relying only on passwords | English | No brand recommended |
| how can my team spot automated attacks by analyzing how people use a site | English | No brand recommended |
| behavioral signals or device checks for detecting account takeover | English | No brand recommended |
| passive user behavior analysis or extra login verification for fraud prevention | English | No brand recommended |
Each engine's top three
Gemini
- = 1
LexisNexis ThreatMetrix
- = 1
Sift
- 3
BioCatch
Related leaderboards
-
LeaderQuickBooks
-
LeaderToyota
-
LeaderAWS
-
LeaderBitdefender
-
LeaderVoiceflow
-
LeaderHubSpot
-
LeaderZendesk
-
LeaderPower BI
-
-
LeaderShopify
-
LeaderMailerLite
-
LeaderCrowdStrike
-
LeaderNetSuite
-
LeaderDocuSign
-
LeaderRevolut
-
LeaderAlkami
-
LeaderGusto
-
-
LeaderPaddle
-
LeaderBitwarden
-
Leadermonday.com
-
LeaderMake
-
-
LeaderNavan
-
LeaderNordVPN
-
LeaderSnyk
-
LeaderWix
Method
Each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.