Most cited source
93citations
From Google AI Overviews
Brands by AI visibility in their industry on Google AI Overviews in Romania, October 2026
Where engines disagree most
Not compared
A list across industries has no engine top three.
Brands
| Brand | Place in its industry | Heralded Score | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ContApp | #11 in accounting tools in Romania | 17 , range 10–35 | 13% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| AlfaSign RO | #12 in e-signature tools in Romania | 17 , range 10–35 | 13% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | #12 in cloud hosting platforms in Romania | 17 , range 5–36 | 10% | 3% | None | First reading | |
| | #12 in cloud hosting platforms in Romania | 17 , range 5–36 | 10% | 3% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in European neobanks in Romania#12 in banks in Romania | 16 , range 9–31 | 10% | 2% | None | First reading | |
| | #14 in cloud hosting platforms in Romania | 14 , range 2–34 | 10% | 0% | | First reading | |
| | #14 in cloud hosting platforms in Romania | 14 , range 2–34 | 10% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| Nexus RO | Unranked in ERP tools in RomaniaUnranked in accounting tools in Romania | 11 , range 2–25 | 5% | 2% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in ERP tools in Romania | Too few answers | 0% | 0% | None | First reading | |
| | Unranked in endpoint security tools in Romania | Too few answers | 0% | 0% | None | First reading |
This list spans more than one industry, so each brand shows its place in its own. Every brand named in at least three answers is placed. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 12 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 13 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 14 | | Vendor site | 1.6% | 1 of 4 | 5 | 0 |
| 15 | | Vendor site | 1.3% | 1 of 4 | 7 | 0 |
| 16 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 17 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 18 | | Brand site | 1.0% | 1 of 4 | 5 | 0 |
| 19 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 20 | | Vendor site | 1.0% | 1 of 4 | 7 | 0 |
The questions, and who wins each
| Question | Language | Wins it |
|---|---|---|
| semnare electronică sau documente scanate pentru firme mici | Romanian | |
| alternative la tipărirea și scanarea contractelor pentru firme mici | Romanian | |
| alternative la semnarea contractelor pe hârtie pentru firme mici | Romanian | |
| sunt administrator într-o firmă cu 10 angajați și vreau să trimit contracte la semnat online | Romanian | eContracte |
| conduc o echipă de vânzări și am nevoie de semnături rapide pentru contractele clienților | Romanian | |
| best e-signature tools for small businesses | English | |
| sign contracts online for small business clients | English | |
| how can a small business get customer contracts signed faster | English | |
| how to collect signatures on agreements without printing | English | |
| digital signatures vs signing paper contracts for small businesses | English | No brand recommended |
Related leaderboards
Method
Each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.