Most cited source
27citations
From Google AI Overviews
B2C brands by AI visibility in their industry on Google AI Overviews in Romania, October 2026
Where engines disagree most
Not compared
A list across industries has no engine top three.
Brands
| Brand | Place in its industry | Heralded Score | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | #1 in project management tools in Romania | 81 , range 71–89 | 90% | 50% | | First reading | |
| | #1 in banks in Romania | 75 , range 55–84 | 86% | 32% | | First reading | |
| | #2 in banks in Romania | 73 , range 53–82 | 86% | 27% | | First reading | |
| | #3 in banks in Romania | 70 , range 51–79 | 91% | 14% | | First reading | |
| | #4 in project management tools in Romania | 43 , range 33–63 | 47% | 13% | | First reading | |
| | #4 in banks in Romania | 41 , range 30–63 | 45% | 9% | | First reading | |
| | #5 in banks in Romania | 41 , range 29–64 | 41% | 14% | | First reading | |
| | #6 in project management tools in Romania | 39 , range 28–57 | 33% | 17% | | First reading | |
| | #6 in banks in Romania | 37 , range 25–57 | 36% | 9% | | First reading | |
| | #6 in banks in Romania | 37 , range 26–55 | 41% | 5% | | First reading |
This list spans more than one industry, so each brand shows its place in its own. Every brand named in at least three answers is placed. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Vendor site | 4.5% | 1 of 4 | 6 | 0 |
| 2 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 3 | | Vendor site | 4.5% | 1 of 4 | 1 | 0 |
| 4 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 5 | | Vendor site | 3.6% | 1 of 4 | 3 | 0 |
| 6 | | Vendor site | 2.7% | 1 of 4 | 4 | Not read |
| 7 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 8 | | Vendor site | 2.7% | 1 of 4 | 1 | 0 |
| 9 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 10 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
The questions, and who wins each
| Question | Language | Wins it |
|---|---|---|
| kanban boards vs task lists for small software teams | English | No brand recommended |
| cel mai bun software crm pentru firme mici | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| gestionarea relațiilor cu clienții pentru firme mici | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| cum poate o firmă mică să urmărească discuțiile cu clienții | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| cum să nu pierd clienții potențiali după primul contact | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| urmărirea manuală a vânzărilor vs crm pentru echipe mici | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| e-mailuri și foi de calcul vs crm pentru echipe de vânzări mici | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| alternative la foile de calcul pentru urmărirea clienților potențiali | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| alternative la evidența manuală a clienților pentru firme mici | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| sunt proprietarul unei firme cu cinci angajați, ce crm pot folosi pentru clienți | Romanian | No brand recommended |
Related leaderboards
Method
Each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.