Most cited source
93citations
From Google AI Overviews
B2C brands by AI visibility in their industry on Google AI Overviews in Romania, October 2026
Where engines disagree most
Not compared
A list across industries has no engine top three.
Brands
| Brand | Place in its industry | Heralded Score | Mentioned | Recommended | By engine | Mentioned by | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | #2 in e-signature tools in Romania | 49 , range 38–71 | 60% | 13% | None | First reading | |
| | #2 in business intelligence tools in Romania | 32 , range 18–46 | 20% | 13% | None | First reading | |
| | #3 in banks in Romania | 70 , range 51–79 | 91% | 14% | None | First reading | |
| | #3 in European neobanks in Romania | 45 , range 34–66 | 47% | 17% | None | First reading | |
| | #3 in e-signature tools in Romania | 43 , range 34–61 | 53% | 7% | None | First reading | |
| | #3 in endpoint security tools in Romania | 38 , range 27–53 | 37% | 10% | None | First reading | |
| | #4 in project management tools in Romania | 43 , range 33–63 | 47% | 13% | None | First reading | |
| | #4 in banks in Romania | 41 , range 30–63 | 45% | 9% | None | First reading | |
| | #4 in European neobanks in Romania | 40 , range 31–58 | 43% | 10% | None | First reading | |
| | #5 in banks in Romania | 41 , range 29–64 | 41% | 14% | None | First reading |
This list spans more than one industry, so each brand shows its place in its own. Every brand named in at least three answers is placed. By engine has one dot per engine (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Google AI Mode), darker the more often it names the brand.
Most cited sources
| Rank | Source | Type | Cited in | Engines | Pages cited | Brands its pages mention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 12 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 13 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 14 | | Vendor site | 1.6% | 1 of 4 | 5 | 0 |
| 15 | | Vendor site | 1.3% | 1 of 4 | 7 | 0 |
| 16 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 17 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 18 | | Brand site | 1.0% | 1 of 4 | 5 | 0 |
| 19 | Withheld. Run a full Snapshot to see it. | |||||
| 20 | | Vendor site | 1.0% | 1 of 4 | 7 | 0 |
The questions, and who wins each
| Question | Language | Wins it |
|---|---|---|
| best business intelligence tools for small businesses | English | No brand recommended |
| business intelligence tools for finance teams | English | No brand recommended |
| how can a finance team spot spending trends across departments | English | No brand recommended |
| how can a sales team see which regions are missing targets | English | No brand recommended |
| spreadsheets vs dashboards for small business owners | English | No brand recommended |
| cele mai bune instrumente de semnătură electronică pentru firme mici | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| semnarea contractelor online pentru firme mici | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| cum poate o firmă mică să semneze contracte fără întâlniri în persoană | Romanian | No brand recommended |
| cum să obțin semnătura clientului pe un contract online | Romanian | |
| semnarea contractelor online sau pe hârtie pentru firme mici | Romanian | No brand recommended |
Related leaderboards
Method
Each month Heralded asks every engine the same buyer questions, twice each, and reads every answer. An answer counts 0 for a brand it leaves out, 50 for a brand it names and 100 for a brand it recommends, and the Heralded Score is built from those. A brand named in at least three answers gets a score and a place.